IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i18p3458-d265202.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Simulation of Stress Hysteresis Effect on Permeability Increase Risk Along A Fault

Author

Listed:
  • Mats Rongved

    (Department of Geoscience and Petroleum, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway)

  • Pierre Cerasi

    (SINTEF Industry, NO-7465 Trondheim, Norway)

Abstract

CO 2 sequestration projects will in the coming years include both aquifer and depleted oil and gas field sites, with different stress paths and history. Stress changes and stress concentration effects on faults will have to be readily assessed, potentially endangering shallower permeable formations. Usually, a fault is modeled as a singularity with shear strength or friction properties, and simulations are run to determine whether the fault is reactivated through shear failure. In this paper, we model a simple rectilinear fault as a finite surface with lowered mechanical properties compared to elsewhere in the domain, which represents a fractured zone alongside the fault core. SINTEF’s Modified Discrete Element code is used coupled to the flow simulator TOUGH2, to model the fracture initiation and propagation, monitoring the permeability increase along the fault. A simplified scenario is simulated, with a sandstone storage reservoir bounded by a fault, penetrating a shale caprock to a shallower sandstone layer. The storage site either undergoes depletion before CO 2 injection or has its pore pressure increased to simulate the case of aquifer storage. Results show that during depletion, shear stresses may develop such that fractures propagate alongside the fault to the upper aquifer. However, for the mirror fault orientation with regards to verticality, no such fractures develop. These results are reversed for the aquifer storage case.

Suggested Citation

  • Mats Rongved & Pierre Cerasi, 2019. "Simulation of Stress Hysteresis Effect on Permeability Increase Risk Along A Fault," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-15, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:18:p:3458-:d:265202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/18/3458/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/18/3458/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:18:p:3458-:d:265202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.