IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i17p3384-d263361.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal Dispatching of Offshore Microgrid Considering Probability Prediction of Tidal Current Speed

Author

Listed:
  • Anan Zhang

    (School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China
    School of Engineering, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF24 3AA, UK)

  • Yangfan Sun

    (School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China)

  • Wei Yang

    (School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China)

  • Huang Huang

    (School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China)

  • Yating Feng

    (School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China)

Abstract

Oceans contain rich tidal current energy, which can provide sufficient power for offshore microgrids. However, the uncertainty of tidal flow may endanger the operational reliability of an offshore microgrid. In this paper, a probabilistic prediction model of tidal current is established based on support vector quantile regression to reduce the influence of uncertainty. Firstly, the penalty factors and kernel parameters of the proposed prediction model was optimized by the dragonfly algorithm to predict the tidal speed of any time of a day in different quantiles. Secondly, combining the above result with the kernel density to predict the probability density function of the tidal current speed, which is to improve the accuracy of prediction in the absence of information. Thirdly, an optimal generation dispatching strategy with tidal current generators is proposed to minimize the fuel consumption of offshore microgrids. Finally, a case study based on the offshore oil and gas platform in Bohai shows that the mean absolute percent error of the proposed model is 2.8142%, which is better than support vector quantile regression model and support vector regression model optimized by the genetic algorithm.

Suggested Citation

  • Anan Zhang & Yangfan Sun & Wei Yang & Huang Huang & Yating Feng, 2019. "Optimal Dispatching of Offshore Microgrid Considering Probability Prediction of Tidal Current Speed," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-17, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:17:p:3384-:d:263361
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/17/3384/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/17/3384/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Shuguang & Lam, Wei-Haur & Cui, Yonggang & Zhang, Tianming & Jiang, Jinxin & Sun, Chong & Guo, Jianhua & Ma, Yanbo & Hamill, Gerard, 2018. "Novel energy coefficient used to predict efflux velocity of tidal current turbine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 730-745.
    2. Neill, Simon P. & Vögler, Arne & Goward-Brown, Alice J. & Baston, Susana & Lewis, Matthew J. & Gillibrand, Philip A. & Waldman, Simon & Woolf, David K., 2017. "The wave and tidal resource of Scotland," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(PA), pages 3-17.
    3. Moghaddam, Amjad Anvari & Seifi, Alireza & Niknam, Taher & Alizadeh Pahlavani, Mohammad Reza, 2011. "Multi-objective operation management of a renewable MG (micro-grid) with back-up micro-turbine/fuel cell/battery hybrid power source," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 6490-6507.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang, Zhixue & Ren, Zhouyang & Li, Hui & Pan, Zhen & Xia, Weiyi, 2024. "A review of tidal current power generation farm planning: Methodologies, characteristics and challenges," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    2. Haddadian, Hossein & Noroozian, Reza, 2017. "Optimal operation of active distribution systems based on microgrid structure," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 197-210.
    3. Yang, Zhaoqing & García Medina, Gabriel & Neary, Vincent S. & Ahn, Seongho & Kilcher, Levi & Bharath, Aidan, 2023. "Multi-decade high-resolution regional hindcasts for wave energy resource characterization in U.S. coastal waters," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 803-817.
    4. Entchev, E. & Yang, L. & Ghorab, M. & Lee, E.J., 2013. "Simulation of hybrid renewable microgeneration systems in load sharing applications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 252-261.
    5. Shen, Xin & Chen, Jin-Ge & Zhu, Xiao-Cheng & Liu, Peng-Yin & Du, Zhao-Hui, 2015. "Multi-objective optimization of wind turbine blades using lifting surface method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P1), pages 1111-1121.
    6. Li, Chong & Zhou, Dequn & Wang, Hui & Lu, Yuzheng & Li, Dongdong, 2020. "Techno-economic performance study of stand-alone wind/diesel/battery hybrid system with different battery technologies in the cold region of China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    7. Shabanpour-Haghighi, Amin & Seifi, Ali Reza, 2015. "Multi-objective operation management of a multi-carrier energy system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 430-442.
    8. Chongfei Sun & Zirong Luo & Jianzhong Shang & Zhongyue Lu & Yiming Zhu & Guoheng Wu, 2018. "Design and Numerical Analysis of a Novel Counter-Rotating Self-Adaptable Wave Energy Converter Based on CFD Technology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-21, March.
    9. Kriett, Phillip Oliver & Salani, Matteo, 2012. "Optimal control of a residential microgrid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 321-330.
    10. Ramadhani, F. & Hussain, M.A. & Mokhlis, H. & Hajimolana, S., 2017. "Optimization strategies for Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC) application: A literature survey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 460-484.
    11. Syed Ali Abbas Kazmi & Muhammad Khuram Shahzad & Akif Zia Khan & Dong Ryeol Shin, 2017. "Smart Distribution Networks: A Review of Modern Distribution Concepts from a Planning Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-47, April.
    12. Javidsharifi, Mahshid & Niknam, Taher & Aghaei, Jamshid & Mokryani, Geev, 2018. "Multi-objective short-term scheduling of a renewable-based microgrid in the presence of tidal resources and storage devices," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 367-381.
    13. McLarty, Dustin & Panossian, Nadia & Jabbari, Faryar & Traverso, Alberto, 2019. "Dynamic economic dispatch using complementary quadratic programming," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 755-764.
    14. Sharma, Sharmistha & Bhattacharjee, Subhadeep & Bhattacharya, Aniruddha, 2018. "Probabilistic operation cost minimization of Micro-Grid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 1116-1139.
    15. Aghaei, Jamshid & Alizadeh, Mohammad-Iman, 2013. "Multi-objective self-scheduling of CHP (combined heat and power)-based microgrids considering demand response programs and ESSs (energy storage systems)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 1044-1054.
    16. Niknam, Taher & Kavousi Fard, Abdollah & Baziar, Aliasghar, 2012. "Multi-objective stochastic distribution feeder reconfiguration problem considering hydrogen and thermal energy production by fuel cell power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 563-573.
    17. Seshu Kumar, R. & Phani Raghav, L. & Koteswara Raju, D. & Singh, Arvind R., 2021. "Impact of multiple demand side management programs on the optimal operation of grid-connected microgrids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    18. Asensio, F.J. & San Martín, J.I. & Zamora, I. & Oñederra, O., 2018. "Model for optimal management of the cooling system of a fuel cell-based combined heat and power system for developing optimization control strategies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 413-430.
    19. Garcia-Novo, Patxi & Inubuse, Masako & Matsuno, Takeshi & Kyozuka, Yusaku & Archer, Philip & Matsuo, Hiroshi & Henzan, Katsuhiro & Sakaguchi, Daisaku, 2024. "Characterization of the wake generated downstream of a MW-scale tidal turbine in Naru Strait, Japan, based on vessel-mounted ADCP data," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    20. Su-jin Hwang & Chul H. Jo, 2019. "Tidal Current Energy Resource Distribution in Korea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-15, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:17:p:3384-:d:263361. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.