IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i11p2176-d238002.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Measured and Calculated Data for NPP Krško CILR Test

Author

Listed:
  • Štefica Vlahović

    (University of Zagreb Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, Unska 3, Zagreb 10000, Croatia)

  • Siniša Šadek

    (University of Zagreb Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, Unska 3, Zagreb 10000, Croatia)

  • Davor Grgić

    (University of Zagreb Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, Unska 3, Zagreb 10000, Croatia)

  • Tomislav Fancev

    (University of Zagreb Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, Unska 3, Zagreb 10000, Croatia)

  • Vesna Benčik

    (University of Zagreb Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, Unska 3, Zagreb 10000, Croatia)

Abstract

Containment is the last barrier for release of radioactive materials in the case of an accident in the nuclear power plant (NPP). Its overall integrity is tested during a containment integrated leak rate test (CILRT) at the design pressure, at regular intervals. Due to applied risk based licensing, the test intervals can be increased up to once in 10 years and beyond. Taking that into account it is important to prepare the test properly and to use obtained results to assess the real status of the containment. The test can be used to verify existing containment calculation models. There is a potential benefit of verified computer models usage for the explanation of some test results, too. NPP Krško has performed CILRT during the plant outage in 2016. The paper presents a comparison between measured data and results calculated using a multivolume GOTHIC (Generation Of Thermal Hydraulic Information For Containment) model. The test scenario was reproduced using limited available data up to the end of the pressurization phase. The depressurization phase is calculated by the code and measured leakage rate is implemented in the model. Taking into account the necessary adjustments in the model, overall prediction of the measured results (in terms of pressure, temperature and humidity) is very good. In the last phase of the test some non-physical behavior is noticed (without influence on overall test results), probably caused by the combination of air redistribution within the containment and influence of heat transfer to plant systems that were in the operation during the test. GOTHIC model was used to check sensitivity of the predicted pressure (leak rate) to different heat inputs and to investigate the influence that operation of only one reactor containment fan cooler (RCFC) train during pressurization can have on the mixing of air within the containment. In addition, the influence of currently used weighting factors (weighting of measured temperature, relative humidity and pressure data) on the used test methodology is investigated. The possible non-conservative direction of the influence (currently used weighting factors are giving lower leakage rate) was demonstrated and a new set of weighting factors is proposed too.

Suggested Citation

  • Štefica Vlahović & Siniša Šadek & Davor Grgić & Tomislav Fancev & Vesna Benčik, 2019. "Comparison of Measured and Calculated Data for NPP Krško CILR Test," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-13, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:11:p:2176-:d:238002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/11/2176/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/11/2176/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:11:p:2176-:d:238002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.