Author
Listed:
- Zhenwei Guo
(Key Laboratory of Metallogenic Prediction of Nonferrous Metals and Geological Environment Monitoring, Central South University, Ministry of Education, Changsha 410083, China
Hunan Key Laboratory of Nonferrous Resources and Geological Hazard Exploration, Changsha 410083, China
School of Geosciences and Info-Physics, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)
- Jianxin Liu
(Key Laboratory of Metallogenic Prediction of Nonferrous Metals and Geological Environment Monitoring, Central South University, Ministry of Education, Changsha 410083, China
Hunan Key Laboratory of Nonferrous Resources and Geological Hazard Exploration, Changsha 410083, China
School of Geosciences and Info-Physics, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)
- Jianping Liao
(State Key Laboratory of Coal Resources and Safe Mining, China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing 100083, China
Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Shale Gas Resource Utilization, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan 411201, China)
- Jianping Xiao
(Key Laboratory of Metallogenic Prediction of Nonferrous Metals and Geological Environment Monitoring, Central South University, Ministry of Education, Changsha 410083, China
Hunan Key Laboratory of Nonferrous Resources and Geological Hazard Exploration, Changsha 410083, China
School of Geosciences and Info-Physics, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)
Abstract
Marine controlled-source electromagnetic (CSEM) is an efficient offshore hydrocarbon exploration method that has been developed during the last 18 years. Sea Bed Logging (SBL) and towed streamer electromagnetic (TSEM) are two different data acquisition systems. We compared these two methods by using 1D sensitivity modeling and 2D Occam’s inversion. Based on this research, we tested the effect of frequency, offset range, water depth, reservoir size, and reservoir depth on the detection capability of the two acquisition methods in terms of sensitivity. In order to test the methodology clearly and simply, the geological model was extremely simplified for the inversion. The effect of these parameters on resolution was checked as another purpose. To easily evaluate our inversion results, a simple quantity was employed that we called the anomaly transverse resistance ratio. In the shallow water environment, both the SBL and the TSEM systems had a good sensitivity to the high resistivity targets. However, in the deep water environment, the SBL system had a low noise floor. Then, it could provide better detectability to the deep target. The TSEM had the advantage in terms of the horizontal resolution because of the dense in-line sampling of the electric field.
Suggested Citation
Zhenwei Guo & Jianxin Liu & Jianping Liao & Jianping Xiao, 2018.
"Comparison of Detection Capability by the Controlled Source Electromagnetic Method for Hydrocarbon Exploration,"
Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-16, July.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:7:p:1839-:d:157824
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:7:p:1839-:d:157824. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.