IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v11y2018i6p1511-d151696.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of Water Immersion on Pore System and Methane Desorption of Shales: A Case Study of Batu Gajah and Kroh Shale Formations in Malaysia

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmed Al-Mutarreb

    (Shale Gas Research Group (SGRG), Institute of Hydrocarbon Recovery, Faculty of Petroleum & Geoscience, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Seri Iskandar 32610, Malaysia)

  • Shiferaw Regassa Jufar

    (Shale Gas Research Group (SGRG), Institute of Hydrocarbon Recovery, Faculty of Petroleum & Geoscience, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Seri Iskandar 32610, Malaysia)

  • Hesham Abdulelah

    (Shale Gas Research Group (SGRG), Institute of Hydrocarbon Recovery, Faculty of Petroleum & Geoscience, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Seri Iskandar 32610, Malaysia)

  • Eswaran Padmanabhan

    (Shale Gas Research Group (SGRG), Institute of Hydrocarbon Recovery, Faculty of Petroleum & Geoscience, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Seri Iskandar 32610, Malaysia)

Abstract

The influence of water on the pore system and gas desorption in shale remains an open question that is not yet fully understood. In this study, we present the effect of water on the shale pore system and recovered desorbed gas through a series of measurements on shale samples. We utilized the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) low pressure N 2 adsorption and Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FE-SEM) to observe and analyze the effects of water immersion and moisture on the pore system of shale samples from Batu Gajah (BG) and Kroh shale formations in Malaysia. The impact of water on desorption was then measured using the United States former Bureau of Mines (USBM) modified method. The results showed that the micropore and mesopore volumes of the Batu Gajah (BG) and Kroh (KH) shale samples were reduced by 64.84% and 44.12%, respectively, after the samples were immersed in water. The BET-specific surface area declined by 88.34% and 59.63% for the BG and KH sample, respectively. Desorption results showed that the methane desorbed volume was (KH: 1.22 cc/g, BG: 0.94 cc/g) for the water immersed sample, and (KH: 0.72 cc/g, BG: 0.60) for the equilibrated sample. The difference can be attributed to the proportion of the organic (total organic carbon) and inorganic (clay) content found in the two shale samples. The total organic carbon (TOC) existing in the KH sample was 12.1 wt %, which was greater than the organic carbon content of the BG sample (2.1 wt %). The clay content was found to be more dominant in the BG shale when compared to the KH shale.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmed Al-Mutarreb & Shiferaw Regassa Jufar & Hesham Abdulelah & Eswaran Padmanabhan, 2018. "Influence of Water Immersion on Pore System and Methane Desorption of Shales: A Case Study of Batu Gajah and Kroh Shale Formations in Malaysia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-15, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:6:p:1511-:d:151696
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/6/1511/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/6/1511/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard G. Newell & Yifei Qian & Daniel Raimi, 2016. "Global Energy Outlook 2015," NBER Working Papers 22075, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hesham Abdulelah & Syed M. Mahmood & Sameer Al-Hajri & Mohammad Hail Hakimi & Eswaran Padmanabhan, 2018. "Retention of Hydraulic Fracturing Water in Shale: The Influence of Anionic Surfactant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-15, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Biying Yu & Guangpu Zhao & Runying An, 2019. "Framing the picture of energy consumption in China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 99(3), pages 1469-1490, December.
    2. Saheli Biswas & Shambhu Singh Rathore & Aniruddha Pramod Kulkarni & Sarbjit Giddey & Sankar Bhattacharya, 2021. "A Theoretical Study on Reversible Solid Oxide Cells as Key Enablers of Cyclic Conversion between Electrical Energy and Fuel," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-18, July.
    3. Coilín ÓhAiseadha & Gerré Quinn & Ronan Connolly & Michael Connolly & Willie Soon, 2020. "Energy and Climate Policy—An Evaluation of Global Climate Change Expenditure 2011–2018," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-49, September.
    4. repec:eco:journ2:2017-04-19 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Mohamed Mohana & Abdelaziz Salah Saidi & Salem Alelyani & Mohammed J. Alshayeb & Suhail Basha & Ali Eisa Anqi, 2021. "Small-Scale Solar Photovoltaic Power Prediction for Residential Load in Saudi Arabia Using Machine Learning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-18, October.
    6. Shaban R. S. Aldhshan & Khairul Nizam Abdul Maulud & Wan Shafrina Wan Mohd Jaafar & Othman A. Karim & Biswajeet Pradhan, 2021. "Energy Consumption and Spatial Assessment of Renewable Energy Penetration and Building Energy Efficiency in Malaysia: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-26, August.
    7. David Comerford & Alessandro Spiganti, 2023. "The Carbon Bubble: climate policy in a fire‐sale model of deleveraging," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 125(3), pages 655-687, July.
    8. Mehdi Neshat & Nataliia Y. Sergiienko & Seyedali Mirjalili & Meysam Majidi Nezhad & Giuseppe Piras & Davide Astiaso Garcia, 2021. "Multi-Mode Wave Energy Converter Design Optimisation Using an Improved Moth Flame Optimisation Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-17, June.
    9. Burgess, Matthew G. & Ritchie, Justin & Shapland, John & Pielke, Roger Jr, 2020. "IPCC baseline scenarios over-project CO2 emissions and economic growth," SocArXiv ahsxw, Center for Open Science.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:6:p:1511-:d:151696. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.