IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v10y2017i9p1285-d110196.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Novel Hybrid Approach for Numerical Modeling of the Nucleating Flow in Laval Nozzle and Transonic Steam Turbine Blades

Author

Listed:
  • Edris Yousefi Rad

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad 9177948974, Iran)

  • Mohammad Reza Mahpeykar

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad 9177948974, Iran)

Abstract

In the present research, considering the importance of desirable steam turbine design, improvement of numerical modeling of steam two-phase flows in convergent and divergent channels and the blades of transonic steam turbines has been targeted. The first novelty of this research is the innovative use of combined Convective Upstream Pressure Splitting (CUSP) and scalar methods to update the flow properties at each calculation point. In other words, each property (density, temperature, pressure and velocity) at each calculation point can be computed from either the CUSP or scalar method, depending on the least deviation criterion. For this reason this innovative method is named “hybrid method”. The next novelty of this research is the use of an inverse method alongside the proposed hybrid method to find the amount of the important parameter z in the CUSP method, which is herein referred to as “CUSP’s convergence parameter”. Using a relatively simple computational grid, firstly, five cases with similar conditions to those of the main cases under study in this research with available experimental data were used to obtain the value of z by the Levenberg-Marquardt inverse method. With this innovation, first, an optimum value of z = 2.667 was obtained using the inverse method and then directly used for the main cases considered in the research. Given that the aim is to investigate the two-dimensional, steady state, inviscid and adiabatic modeling of steam nucleating flows in three different nozzle and turbine blade geometries, flow simulation was performed using a relatively simple mesh and the innovative proposed hybrid method (scalar + CUSP, with the desired value of z = 2.667 ). A comparison between the results of the hybrid modeling of the three main cases with experimental data showed a very good agreement, even within shock zones, including the condensation shock region, revealing the efficiency of this numerical modeling method innovation. The main factor in improving the aforementioned results was found to be a reduction of the numerical errors by up to 70% in comparison to conventional methods (scalar, Jameson original), so that the mass flow rate is well conserved, thereby proving better satisfaction of the conservation laws. It should be noted that by using this innovative hybrid method, one can take advantages of both central difference scheme and upstream scheme (scalar and CUSP, respectively) at the same time in simulating complex flows in any other finite volume scheme.

Suggested Citation

  • Edris Yousefi Rad & Mohammad Reza Mahpeykar, 2017. "A Novel Hybrid Approach for Numerical Modeling of the Nucleating Flow in Laval Nozzle and Transonic Steam Turbine Blades," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-37, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:10:y:2017:i:9:p:1285-:d:110196
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/9/1285/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/9/1285/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiaoqing Wei & Nianping Li & Jinqing Peng & Jianlin Cheng & Jinhua Hu & Meng Wang, 2017. "Performance Analyses of Counter-Flow Closed Wet Cooling Towers Based on a Simplified Calculation Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-15, February.
    2. Kleijnen, Jack P. C., 1995. "Verification and validation of simulation models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(1), pages 145-162, April.
    3. Yasushi Ishida & Masaaki Bannai & Takahiko Miyazaki & Yasushi Harada & Ryuichi Yokoyama & Atsushi Akisawa, 2009. "The Optimal Operation Criteria for a Gas Turbine Cogeneration System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-24, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xu Han & Zhonghe Han & Wei Zeng & Jiangbo Qian & Zhi Wang, 2017. "Coupled Model of Heat and Mass Balance for Droplet Growth in Wet Steam Non-Equilibrium Homogeneous Condensation Flow," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-12, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Juan Manuel Larrosa, 2016. "Agentes computacionales y análisis económico," Revista de Economía Institucional, Universidad Externado de Colombia - Facultad de Economía, vol. 18(34), pages 87-113, January-J.
    2. Pau Fonseca i Casas, 2023. "A Continuous Process for Validation, Verification, and Accreditation of Simulation Models," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-25, February.
    3. H. Christopher Frey & Sumeet R. Patil, 2002. "Identification and Review of Sensitivity Analysis Methods," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(3), pages 553-578, June.
    4. Tunali, S. & Batmaz, I., 2003. "A metamodeling methodology involving both qualitative and quantitative input factors," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(2), pages 437-450, October.
    5. Patrick Afflerbach & Christopher Dun & Henner Gimpel & Dominik Parak & Johannes Seyfried, 2021. "A Simulation-Based Approach to Understanding the Wisdom of Crowds Phenomenon in Aggregating Expert Judgment," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 63(4), pages 329-348, August.
    6. Xiaoqing Wei & Nianping Li & Jinqing Peng & Jianlin Cheng & Jinhua Hu & Meng Wang, 2017. "Modeling and Optimization of a CoolingTower-Assisted Heat Pump System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-18, May.
    7. Diaz, Rafael & Behr, Joshua G. & Acero, Beatriz, 2022. "Coastal housing recovery in a postdisaster environment: A supply chain perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    8. Kleijnen, J.P.C., 1995. "Sensitivity analysis and optimization of system dynamics models : Regression analysis and statistical design of experiments," Other publications TiSEM 87ee6ee0-592c-4204-ac50-6, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    9. Janová, Jitka & Hampel, David & Nerudová, Danuše, 2019. "Design and validation of a tax sustainability index," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(3), pages 916-926.
    10. Sander van der Hoog, 2017. "Deep Learning in (and of) Agent-Based Models: A Prospectus," Papers 1706.06302, arXiv.org.
    11. Aumann, Craig A., 2007. "A methodology for developing simulation models of complex systems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 202(3), pages 385-396.
    12. Giuliano Rancilio & Alexandre Lucas & Evangelos Kotsakis & Gianluca Fulli & Marco Merlo & Maurizio Delfanti & Marcelo Masera, 2019. "Modeling a Large-Scale Battery Energy Storage System for Power Grid Application Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-26, August.
    13. MacPherson, Brian & Gras, Robin, 2016. "Individual-based ecological models: Adjunctive tools or experimental systems?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 323(C), pages 106-114.
    14. Ao, Dan & Hu, Zhen & Mahadevan, Sankaran, 2017. "Design of validation experiments for life prediction models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 22-33.
    15. Labaka, Leire & Hernantes, Josune & Sarriegi, Jose M., 2015. "Resilience framework for critical infrastructures: An empirical study in a nuclear plant," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 92-105.
    16. Kleijnen, Jack P. C. & Sargent, Robert G., 2000. "A methodology for fitting and validating metamodels in simulation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 120(1), pages 14-29, January.
    17. Aros, Susan K. & Gibbons, Deborah E., 2018. "Exploring communication media options in an inter-organizational disaster response coordination network using agent-based simulation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(2), pages 451-465.
    18. Meiyan Wang & Chen Chen & Bingxin Fan & Zilu Yin & Wenxuan Li & Huifang Wang & Fang’ai Chi, 2023. "Multi-Objective Optimization of Envelope Design of Rural Tourism Buildings in Southeastern Coastal Areas of China Based on NSGA-II Algorithm and Entropy-Based TOPSIS Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-27, April.
    19. Kleijnen, J. P. C., 2001. "Ethical issues in modeling: Some reflections," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(1), pages 223-230, April.
    20. Strang, Kenneth David, 2012. "Importance of verifying queue model assumptions before planning with simulation software," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 218(2), pages 493-504.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:10:y:2017:i:9:p:1285-:d:110196. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.