IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v10y2017i12p2014-d121163.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Model-Based Control Solutions for Severe Riser-Induced Slugs

Author

Listed:
  • Simon Pedersen

    (Department of Energy Technology, Aalborg University, Esbjerg DK-6700, Denmark)

  • Esmaeil Jahanshahi

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim NO-7491, Norway)

  • Zhenyu Yang

    (Department of Energy Technology, Aalborg University, Esbjerg DK-6700, Denmark)

  • Sigurd Skogestad

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim NO-7491, Norway)

Abstract

Control solutions for eliminating severe riser-induced slugs in offshore oil & gas pipeline installations are key topics in offshore Exploration and Production (E&P) processes. This study describes the identification, analysis and control of a low-dimensional control-oriented model of a lab-scaled slug testing facility. The model is analyzed and used for anti-slug control development for both lowpoint and topside transmitter solutions. For the controlled variables’ comparison it is concluded that the topside pressure transmitter ( P t ) is the most difficult output to apply directly for anti-slug control due to the inverse response. However, as P t often is the only accessible measurement on offshore platforms this study focuses on the controller development for both P t and the lowpoint pressure transmitter ( P b ). All the control solutions are based on linear control schemes and the performance of the controllers are evaluated from simulations with both the non-linear MATLAB and OLGA models. Furthermore, the controllers are studied with input disturbances and parametric variations to evaluate their robustness. For both pressure transmitters the H ∞ loop-shaping controller gives the best performance as it is relatively robust to disturbances and has a fast convergence rate. However, P t does not increase the closed-loop bifurcation point significantly and is also sensitive to disturbances. Thus the study concludes that the best option for single-input-single-output (SISO) systems is to control P b with a H ∞ loop-shaping controller. It is suggested that for cases where only topside transmitters are available a cascaded combination of the outlet mass flow and P t could be considered to improve the performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Simon Pedersen & Esmaeil Jahanshahi & Zhenyu Yang & Sigurd Skogestad, 2017. "Comparison of Model-Based Control Solutions for Severe Riser-Induced Slugs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-19, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:10:y:2017:i:12:p:2014-:d:121163
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/12/2014/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/12/2014/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rasmus Thy Jørgensen & Gunvor Rossen Tonnesen & Matthias Mandø & Simon Pedersen, 2020. "Comparative Study of CFD and LedaFlow Models for Riser-Induced Slug Flow," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-11, July.
    2. Nailiang Li & Bin Chen & Xueping Du & Dongtai Han, 2022. "Experimental and Numerical Study on the Elimination of Severe Slugging by Riser Outlet Choking," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-17, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:10:y:2017:i:12:p:2014-:d:121163. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.