IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jecomi/v9y2021i3p107-d599851.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Empirical Analysis of Military Expenditures in NATO Nations

Author

Listed:
  • Jakub Odehnal

    (Department of Resources Management, University of Defence, Kounicova 65, 66210 Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Jiří Neubauer

    (Department of Resources Management, University of Defence, Kounicova 65, 66210 Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Aleš Olejníček

    (Department of Resources Management, University of Defence, Kounicova 65, 66210 Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Jana Boulaouad

    (Department of Resources Management, University of Defence, Kounicova 65, 66210 Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Lenka Brizgalová

    (Department of Resources Management, University of Defence, Kounicova 65, 66210 Brno, Czech Republic)

Abstract

The aim of the article is to identify possible “follower” behaviour; it means to reveal countries following the average military burden of North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) member states. To analyse the relationship between military expenditure of NATO member states and selected socio-economic variables (average military burden of NATO member states, gross domestic product, government expenditure (non-military), share of trade balance of gross domestic product and population), the Autoregressive Distributed Lag model has been used. The short-term results demonstrate follower behaviour, especially in the new NATO member states (effort to fulfil the commitment to spend 2% of gross domestic product on defence). The long-term results have revealed a positive relationship between military expenditures and the variable describing the average military burden of NATO member states in the traditional and also new NATO member states. A positive relationship between military expenditure and gross domestic product has also been observed in the majority of evaluated countries in the long-term model. The public good effect has been determined in six member states only, and the crowding out effect in five member states. A positive effect of the balance of trade on military expenditure has been observed in two countries only.

Suggested Citation

  • Jakub Odehnal & Jiří Neubauer & Aleš Olejníček & Jana Boulaouad & Lenka Brizgalová, 2021. "Empirical Analysis of Military Expenditures in NATO Nations," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-15, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:9:y:2021:i:3:p:107-:d:599851
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/9/3/107/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/9/3/107/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yasmine M. Abdelfattah & Aamer S. Abu-Qarn & J. Paul Dunne & Shadwa Zaher, 2014. "The Demand for Military Spending in Egypt," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 231-245, June.
    2. Julien Malizard, 2014. "Defense Spending and Unemployment in France," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(6), pages 635-642, December.
    3. Luís Miguel Marques & José Alberto Fuinhas & António Cardoso Marques, 2019. "Are There Spillovers from China on the Global Energy-Growth Nexus? Evidence from Four World Regions," Economies, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-19, June.
    4. V. Tambovtsev., 2014. "Public Goods and Public Interests: Is There a Connection?," VOPROSY ECONOMIKI, N.P. Redaktsiya zhurnala "Voprosy Economiki", vol. 11.
    5. M. Hashem Pesaran & Yongcheol Shin & Richard J. Smith, 2001. "Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(3), pages 289-326.
    6. Angeliki N. Menegaki, 2019. "The ARDL Method in the Energy-Growth Nexus Field; Best Implementation Strategies," Economies, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-16, October.
    7. Todd Sandler & James C. Murdoch, 2000. "On sharing NATO defence burdens in the 1990s and beyond," Fiscal Studies, Institute for Fiscal Studies, vol. 21(3), pages 297-327, September.
    8. Mete Feridun & Bansi Sawhney & Muhammad Shahbaz, 2011. "The Impact of Military Spending on Economic Growth: The Case of North Cyprus," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(5), pages 555-562, January.
    9. Jakub Odehnal & Jiří Neubauer, 2020. "Economic, Security, and Political Determinants of Military Spending in NATO Countries," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(5), pages 517-531, July.
    10. Petar Kurecic & Filip Kokotovic, 2017. "The Relevance of Political Stability on FDI: A VAR Analysis and ARDL Models for Selected Small, Developed, and Instability Threatened Economies," Economies, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-21, June.
    11. Todd Sandler, 1977. "Impurity Of Defense: An Application To The Economics Of Alliances," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(3), pages 443-460, August.
    12. Tsang, Eric W. K., 2014. "Old and New," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(03), pages 390-390, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jakub Odehnal & Jiří Neubauer & Lukáš Dyčka & Tereza Ambler, 2020. "Development of Military Spending Determinants in Baltic Countries—Empirical Analysis," Economies, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-18, August.
    2. Theodosios Anastasios Perifanis, 2022. "The Macroeconomic Results of Diligent Resource Revenues Management: The Norwegian Case," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-14, February.
    3. Stephen Esaku, 2022. "Institutionalized democracy and the shadow economy in the short- and long-run: empirical analysis from Uganda," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-12, December.
    4. Armenia Androniceanu & Irina Georgescu & Ionuț Nica & Nora Chiriță, 2023. "A Comprehensive Analysis of Renewable Energy Based on Integrating Economic Cybernetics and the Autoregressive Distributed Lag Model—The Case of Romania," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-28, August.
    5. Devi Prasad DASH & Debi Prasad BAL & Manoranjan SAHOO, 2016. "Nexus between defense expenditure and economic growth in BRIC economies: An empirical investigation," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(1(606), S), pages 89-102, Spring.
    6. Marques, António Cardoso & Junqueira, Thibaut Manuel, 2022. "European energy transition: Decomposing the performance of nuclear power," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    7. Moloko Kholofelo Mokgokong & Ireen Choga, 2024. "Analysing Real Exchange Rate Effects on the Trade Balance in South Africa," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 14(6), pages 64-76, October.
    8. Izunna Chima Anyikwa & Lehlohonolo Domela, 2022. "Asymmetric effects of exchange rate volatility on trade flows in BRICS economies," Studies in Economics and Econometrics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(3), pages 224-247, July.
    9. Ulrich KEMBENG, 2022. "Military Expenditure and Economic Growth in Chad: An Application of The ARDL Method," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 6(9), pages 471-475, September.
    10. Serkan K n & Serta Hopo lu & G rkan Bozma, 2016. "Conflict, Defense Spending and Economic Growth in the Middle East: A Panel Data Analysis," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 6(1), pages 80-86.
    11. Hanif, Abu & Salah Uddin, Muhammad & Bakirtas, Tahsin & Kader, Sheikh Abdul, 2023. "Military Expenditure and Unemployment Nexus in Bangladesh," Revista Finanzas y Politica Economica, Universidad Católica de Colombia, vol. 15(1), pages 157-184, January.
    12. Prabal Roy Chowdhury, 2006. "Alliances among asymmetric countries," Discussion Papers 06-04, Indian Statistical Institute, Delhi.
    13. Ha Junsheng & Yuning Mu & Muhammad Mehedi Masud & Rulia Akhtar & Abu Naser Mohammad Saif & K. M. Anwarul Islam & Nusrat Hafiz, 2024. "Navigating the nexus: unraveling technological innovation, economic growth, trade openness, ICT, and CO2 emissions through symmetric and asymmetric analysis," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
    14. Mohamed, Hassen & Alimi, Mohsen & Ben Youssef, Slim, 2021. "The role of renewable energy in reducing terrorism: Evidence from Pakistan," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 1088-1100.
    15. George, Justin & Sandler, Todd, 2018. "Demand for military spending in NATO, 1968–2015: A spatial panel approach," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 222-236.
    16. Tariq Hussain & Ahmad Raza Ul Mustafa & Makhdum M.I. & Kaleem Ullah, 2022. "Defense Expenditures, Fiscal Deficit And Debt Servicing Nexus: A Case Study Of Pakistan," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 11(2), pages 74-83, June.
    17. Jen-Yao Lee & Ya-Chuan Hsiao & Ngochien Bui & Tien-Thinh Nguyen, 2021. "Inward Foreign Direct Investment and Trade Openness in Vietnam: A Nonlinear Autoregressive Distributed Lag Approach," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-18, August.
    18. Muzekenyi Mike & Nyika Farai & Anyikwa Izunna & Kemda Lionel Establet, 2023. "Re-Examining the Impact of Public Education Expenditure on South African Literacy," Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 37(1), pages 90-103, January.
    19. Akber, Nusrat & Paltasingh, Kirtti Ranjan & Mishra, Ashok K., 2022. "How can public policy encourage private investments in Indian agriculture? Input subsidies vs. public investment," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    20. Sohail Amjed & Iqtidar Ali Shah & Adnan Riaz, 2022. "Investigating the Interactive Role of Demand Side Factors Potentially Responsible for Energy Crisis in Pakistan," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 12(3), pages 236-246, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:9:y:2021:i:3:p:107-:d:599851. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.