IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jecomi/v12y2024i6p135-d1405367.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Timing and Strength of Inequality Concerns in the UK Public Debate: Google Trends, Elections and the Macroeconomy

Author

Listed:
  • Knut Lehre Seip

    (Faculty of Technology, Art and Design, Oslo Metropolitan University, P.O. Box 4, St. Olavs Plass, Pilestredet Park 33, 0176 Oslo, Norway)

  • Frode Eika Sandnes

    (Department of Computer Science, Oslo Metropolitan University, 0167 Oslo, Norway)

Abstract

Inequality among people has several unwanted effects, in humanistic, social and economic contexts. Several studies address distributional preferences among groups, but little is known about when inequality issues are focused and when and why inequality abatement measures are brought on the political agenda. We show that during the period 2004 to 2023, inequality issues were focused during elections to the EU and UK parliament and with greatest strength during the elections to the EU parliament in May 2004 and to the UK parliament in May 2015. Periods with high unemployment and inflation cause the discussion on inequality to be followed by discussions on inequality measures. However, when the discussion of inequality is followed very closely by the discussions of abatement measures, inequality aversion becomes more strongly associated with the macroeconomic variables inflation and GDP (recessions) than with unemployment and more strongly associated with the concerns for fairness than concerns with war and crime. The results were obtained examining Google Trends and scholarly studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Knut Lehre Seip & Frode Eika Sandnes, 2024. "The Timing and Strength of Inequality Concerns in the UK Public Debate: Google Trends, Elections and the Macroeconomy," Economies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-17, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:12:y:2024:i:6:p:135-:d:1405367
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/12/6/135/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/12/6/135/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Murat Cetin & Harun Demir & Selin Saygin, 2021. "Financial Development, Technological Innovation and Income Inequality: Time Series Evidence from Turkey," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 156(1), pages 47-69, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Uche, Emmanuel & Ngepah, Nicholas & Onwe, Joshua Chukwuma & Zaman, Umer & Odhiambo, Nicholas M., 2024. "A question for sustainable development goal 10: How relevant is innovation patenting receipts to income distributions?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    2. Zhao, Wen-Xuan & Samour, Ahmed & Yi, Kefu & Al-Faryan, Mamdouh Abdulaziz Saleh, 2023. "Do technological innovation, natural resources and stock market development promote environmental sustainability? Novel evidence based on the load capacity factor," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    3. Mduduzi Biyase & Talent Zwane & Precious Mncayi & Mokgadi Maleka, 2023. "Do Technological Innovation and Financial Development Affect Inequality? Evidence from BRICS Countries," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, March.
    4. Li, Jinlong & Shi, Yang & Song, Xiaowei, 2024. "The dynamics of digitalization and natural resources in shaping the sustainable development agenda in BRICS-T nations," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    5. Tomiwa Sunday Adebayo & Mehmet Ağa, 2022. "The Race to Zero Emissions in MINT Economies: Can Economic Growth, Renewable Energy and Disintegrated Trade Be the Path to Carbon Neutrality?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-20, October.
    6. Zhu, Xiaoge & Niu, Xiaoqin, 2024. "Impact of fintech, mineral resources extraction, and globalization on social inequality: Exploring the role of technology innovation in G10 economies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    7. Nimet Melis Esenyel İçen, 2024. "Investigation of Parabolic Relationship Between Financial Development and Income Inequality using U Test: Analysis of Financial Curve in Türkiye," Journal of Economic Policy Researches, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 11(2), pages 355-369, July.
    8. Tomiwa Sunday Adebayo, 2024. "Exploring the heterogeneous impact of technological innovation on income inequality: Formulating the SDG policies for the BRICS-T economies," Energy & Environment, , vol. 35(4), pages 1773-1792, June.
    9. Çetin, Murat & Sarıgül, Sevgi Sümerli & Işık, Cem & Avcı, Pınar & Ahmad, Munir & Alvarado, Rafael, 2023. "The impact of natural resources, economic growth, savings, and current account balance on financial sector development: Theory and empirical evidence," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    10. Md. Emran Hossain & Ehsan Ullah & Mohd Ziaur Rehman & Mohammad Haseeb & Miguel Angel Esquivias, 2024. "Going Sustainable or Going Extinct: The Consequences of Clean Technologies, Green Finance, and Natural Resources on the Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-18, July.
    11. Andrew Adewale Alola & Tomiwa Sunday Adebayo, 2023. "Are green resource productivity and environmental technologies the face of environmental sustainability in the Nordic region?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 760-772, April.
    12. Anran Xiao & Zeshui Xu & Marinko Skare & Yong Qin & Xinxin Wang, 2024. "Bridging the digital divide: the impact of technological innovation on income inequality and human interactions," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, December.
    13. Hamza Çeştepe & Murat Çetin & Pınar Avcı & Bersu Bahtiyar, 2024. "The link between technological innovation and financial development: Evidence from selected OECD countries," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(2), pages 1219-1235, April.
    14. Mohamed Ali Chroufa & Nouri Chtourou, 2022. "Inequality and Growth in Tunisia: New Evidence from Threshold Regression," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 163(2), pages 901-924, September.
    15. Salih Ozturk & Murat Cetin & Harun Demir, 2022. "Income inequality and CO2 emissions: nonlinear evidence from Turkey," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(10), pages 11911-11928, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:12:y:2024:i:6:p:135-:d:1405367. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.