IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jecomi/v12y2024i5p104-d1384805.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Navigating Kazakhstan’s Sustainable Economic Future: A Study of Tech Innovation, Infrastructure, and Resource Management

Author

Listed:
  • Gani Rakhymzhan

    (Department of International Relations and World Economy, Faculty of International Relations, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan)

  • Nazym Esbergenovna Dabyltayeva

    (Department of Tourism and Service Maintenance, Faculty of Economic and Business, Almaty Technological University, Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan)

  • Gaukhar Sakhanova

    (Department of Tourism and Service Maintenance, Faculty of Economic and Business, Almaty Technological University, Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan)

  • Elvira Abdulmitovna Ruziyeva

    (Department of Tourism and Service Maintenance, Faculty of Economic and Business, Almaty Technological University, Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan)

  • Assemgul Bauirzhanovna Bekmukhametova

    (Department of International Relations and World Economy, Faculty of International Relations, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan)

Abstract

In a quest to illuminate Kazakhstan’s economic horizon within a sustainable context, this study delved into the complex interplay of sustainable tech innovation, investment in sustainable infrastructure, and natural resource management. The study assesses the potential for green economy development by introducing the adoption of sustainable practices as the mediator and corporate social responsibility as the moderator in the examined relationships. We employed a cluster sampling technique, focusing on government sector employees in Kazakhstan. The choice of this sector stemmed from its pivotal role in shaping national policies. A time-lagged approach was incorporated, collecting data at two distinct time points to capture the dynamic evolution of green initiatives over time. As the data unfolded, sustainable tech innovation, investment in sustainable infrastructure, and natural resource management emerged as significant predictors for adopting environmentally responsible practices leading to green economy development. This development process, we found, was further augmented by the moderating influence of corporate social responsibility. Hence, our findings contribute both practical and theoretical insights to the discourse on sustainable economic development. In addressing the intricate interplay of technological, infrastructural, and resource-related factors, this study provides guidance for Kazakhstan’s ongoing transition towards a more sustainable and resilient economic trajectory.

Suggested Citation

  • Gani Rakhymzhan & Nazym Esbergenovna Dabyltayeva & Gaukhar Sakhanova & Elvira Abdulmitovna Ruziyeva & Assemgul Bauirzhanovna Bekmukhametova, 2024. "Navigating Kazakhstan’s Sustainable Economic Future: A Study of Tech Innovation, Infrastructure, and Resource Management," Economies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-19, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:12:y:2024:i:5:p:104-:d:1384805
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/12/5/104/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/12/5/104/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wellbrock Wanja & Daniela Ludin & Ludwig Lisa N & Muhlfeld & Kristina, 2020. "Sustainable agriculture trough regional solidary in global markets," Journal of Applied and Physical Sciences, Prof. Vakhrushev Alexander, vol. 6(1), pages 01-10.
    2. Di Foggia, Giacomo & Beccarello, Massimo & Borgarello, Marco & Bazzocchi, Francesca & Moscarelli, Stefano, 2022. "Market-Based Instruments to Promote Energy Efficiency: Insights from the Italian Case," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 15(20), pages 1-16.
    3. Yan Xue & Caidong Jiang & Yunxia Guo & Jianmin Liu & Haitao Wu & Yu Hao, 2022. "Corporate Social Responsibility and High-quality Development: Do Green Innovation, Environmental Investment and Corporate Governance Matter?," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(11), pages 3191-3214, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Junlong & Sun, Chaoqun & Xu, Bo & Kong, Yan, 2024. "Emission reduction technology R&D and sharing with environmental corporate social responsibility," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    2. Lina Mao & Guangfan Sun & Yining He & Huixia Chen & Changwei Guo, 2024. "Culture and Sustainability: Evidence from Tea Culture and Corporate Social Responsibility in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-17, May.
    3. Licheng Yang & Shijie Song & Chunlin Liu, 2024. "Green signals: The impact of environmental protection support policies on firms' green innovation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 3258-3278, May.
    4. Wen, Jun & Zhang, Sen & Chang, Chun-Ping & Anugrah, Donni Fajar & Affandi, Yoga, 2023. "Does climate vulnerability promote green investment under energy supply restriction?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    5. Reema Gh. Alajmi, 2024. "Total-Factor Energy Efficiency (TFEE) and CO 2 Emissions for GCC Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-14, January.
    6. Beccarello, Massimo & Di Foggia, Giacomo, 2023. "Meeting decarbonization targets: Techno-economic insights from the Italian scenario," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 2.
    7. Yuxin Ning & Yihan Zhang, 2023. "Does Digital Finance Improve Corporate ESG Performance? An Intermediary Role Based on Financing Constraints," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-17, July.
    8. Massimo Beccarello & Giacomo Di Foggia, 2023. "Review and Perspectives of Key Decarbonization Drivers to 2030," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-13, January.
    9. Keke Bai & Farid Ullah & Muhammad Arif & Sahar Erfanian & Saima Urooge, 2023. "Stakeholder-Centered Corporate Governance and Corporate Sustainable Development: Evidence from CSR Practices in the Top Companies by Market Capitalization at Shanghai Stock Exchange of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-25, February.
    10. Wei, Jia & Wen, Jun & Wang, Xiao-Yang & Ma, Jie & Chang, Chun-Ping, 2023. "Green innovation, natural extreme events, and energy transition: Evidence from Asia-Pacific economies," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    11. Zhiqiang Zhang & Yifan Bai, 2024. "Research on Whether Quality Policies Can Promote the High-Quality Development of China’s Manufacturing Industry and Its Configuration Paths in the Context of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-31, November.
    12. Lee, Chien-Chiang & Tang, Manting & Lee, Chi-Chuan, 2023. "Reaping digital dividends: Digital inclusive finance and high-quality development of enterprises in China," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(2).
    13. Chuanlin Wang & Guowan Yan & Juan Ou, 2023. "Does Digitization Promote Green Innovation? Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-27, February.
    14. Hao, Yu & Guo, Yunxia & Li, Suixin & Luo, Shiyue & Jiang, Xueting & Shen, Zhiyang & Wu, Haitao, 2022. "Towards achieving the sustainable development goal of industry: How does industrial agglomeration affect air pollution?," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 1(1).
    15. Yixuan Chen & Shanyue Jin, 2023. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Green Technology Innovation: The Moderating Role of Stakeholders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-20, May.
    16. Sisi Zheng & Shanyue Jin, 2023. "Can Enterprises in China Achieve Sustainable Development through Green Investment?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-25, January.
    17. Mingbo Zheng & Gen-Fu Feng & Xinxin Zhao & Chun-Ping Chang, 2023. "The transaction behavior of cryptocurrency and electricity consumption," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 9(1), pages 1-18, December.
    18. Niu, Peng & Sun, Kun & Sun, Lirong & Chang, Chao-Wen, 2024. "The political economy and green innovation: A scientometric analysis," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 3(2).
    19. Wen Qi & Yanyang Yan & Hongbing Yin, 2023. "Protecting Innovation Sustainability: R&D Manipulation and Effective Regulation Based on a Two-Scenario Evolutionary Game Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-21, June.
    20. Wen, Jun & Zhao, Xinxin & Fu, Qiang & Chang, Chun-Ping, 2023. "The impact of financial risk on green innovation: Global evidence," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:12:y:2024:i:5:p:104-:d:1384805. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.