IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jecomi/v12y2024i3p55-d1345203.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pathways to Prosperity: Navigating Post-Stagnation Growth and Revitalizing Business

Author

Listed:
  • Vladislav Spitsin

    (Business School, National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University, 634050 Tomsk, Russia)

  • Darko B. Vuković

    (Graduate School of Management, Saint Petersburg State University, 199004 Saint Petersburg, Russia
    Geographical Institute “Jovan Cvijic” SASA, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Marina Ryzhkova

    (Business School, National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University, 634050 Tomsk, Russia)

  • Victoria Leonova

    (Business School, National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University, 634050 Tomsk, Russia)

Abstract

This study examines the ways in which firms recover from stagnation or sales decline, with a focus on two key aspects: traditional high-growth companies and growth restarts within the framework of organizational life cycle theory. Analyzing a dataset of 1883 Russian firms from 2013 to 2021, this research employs logistic regression to identify factors that promote growth. These factors include the youth of the firm, investment intensity, and significant sales drops during periods of stagnation. The study introduces a new economic category, termed ‘restarting growth’, which signifies a firm’s sustained expansion following an extended period of stagnation. This category is crucial for identifying factors that increase the likelihood of a company transitioning to growth after prolonged stagnation or production downturn. The findings of this study reveal that firms that are younger, invest more intensively in fixed capital, and have experienced a larger sales drop during a period of stagnation are more likely to transition to growth. These results are juxtaposed with the growth factors characteristic of traditional high-growth companies, as well as with the theoretical approaches explaining growth restarts within the framework of organizational life cycle theory. Such distinctions are pivotal both for academic understanding and practical applications in discerning how companies rebound from crises. Moreover, the research identifies several highly significant factors—indicators that can assist investors in selecting promising firms for financing.

Suggested Citation

  • Vladislav Spitsin & Darko B. Vuković & Marina Ryzhkova & Victoria Leonova, 2024. "Pathways to Prosperity: Navigating Post-Stagnation Growth and Revitalizing Business," Economies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-26, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:12:y:2024:i:3:p:55-:d:1345203
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/12/3/55/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/12/3/55/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Evans, David S, 1987. "The Relationship between Firm Growth, Size, and Age: Estimates for 100 Manufacturing Industries," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(4), pages 567-581, June.
    2. Zoltán J. Ács & Pamela Mueller, 2015. "Employment effects of business dynamics: Mice, Gazelles and Elephants," Chapters, in: Global Entrepreneurship, Institutions and Incentives, chapter 16, pages 304-319, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Paul Nightingale & Alex Coad, 2014. "Muppets and gazelles: political and methodological biases in entrepreneurship research," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 23(1), pages 113-143, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ivan Savin & Maria Novitskaya, 2023. "Data-driven definitions of gazelle companies that rule out chance: application for Russia and Spain," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 13(3), pages 507-542, September.
    2. Sorin Gabriel Anton, 2019. "Leverage and firm growth: an empirical investigation of gazelles from emerging Europe," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 209-232, March.
    3. Siepel, Josh & Cowling, Marc & Coad, Alex, 2017. "Non-founder human capital and the long-run growth and survival of high-tech ventures," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 34-43.
    4. Elena Cefis & Franco Malerba & Orietta Marsili & Luigi Orsenigo, 2021. "Time to exit: “revolving door effect” or “Schumpeterian gale of creative destruction”?," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 31(5), pages 1465-1494, November.
    5. Yazid Abdullahi Abubakar & Jay Mitra, 2017. "Knowledge spillovers and high-impact growth: Comparing local and foreign firms in the UK," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 145-176, June.
    6. Gjerløv-Juel, Pernille & Guenther, Christina, 2019. "Early employment expansion and long-run survival," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 80-102.
    7. J. David Brown & John S. Earle & Mee Jung Kim & Kyung Min Lee, 2017. "High-Growth Entrepreneurship," Working Papers 17-53, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    8. Erhardt, Eva Christine, 2018. "Firm performance after high growth: A comparison of absolute and relative growth measures," MPRA Paper 88077, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Marco Vivarelli, 2013. "Is entrepreneurship necessarily good? Microeconomic evidence from developed and developing countries," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 22(6), pages 1453-1495, December.
    10. Flavio Calvino & Daniele Giachini & Mattia Guerini, 2022. "The age distribution of business firms," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 205-245, January.
    11. Yuji Honjo, 2018. "Do profitable start-up firms grow faster? Evidence from Colombia," Revista Cuadernos de Economia, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, FCE, CID, vol. 37(75), pages 727-754, March.
    12. Besnik A. Krasniqi & Sameeksha Desai, 2016. "Institutional drivers of high-growth firms: country-level evidence from 26 transition economies," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 1075-1094, December.
    13. Alessandra Colombelli & Jackie Krafft & Francesco Quatraro, 2015. "Eco-Innovation and Firm Growth: Do Green Gazelles Run Faster? Microeconometric Evidence from a Sample of European Firms," GREDEG Working Papers 2015-12, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
    14. Raysa Geaquinto Rocha & João J. Ferreira, 2022. "Gazelles (High-Growth) Companies: a Bibliometric Science Map of the Field," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(4), pages 2911-2934, December.
    15. Alessandra Colombelli & Jackie Krafft & Francesco Quatraro, 2015. "Eco-innovation and Firm Growth: Do Green Gazelles Run Faster? Microeconometric Evidence from a Sample of European Firms. WWWforEurope Working Paper No. 88," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 57897.
    16. Erhardt, Eva, 2017. "Who persistently creates jobs? Absolute versus relative high-growth firms," MPRA Paper 79307, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Giulia Cattafi & Giovanna Mariani & Francesco Pistolesi & Domenico Nicol?, 2023. "Cheating in the evaluation. An expedient to estimate the impact of intangibles on the enterprise value of the high-growth start-ups," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2023(3), pages 193-218.
    18. Brown, J. David & Earle, John S. & Morgulis, Yana, 2015. "Job Creation, Small vs. Large vs. Young, and the SBA," IZA Discussion Papers 9489, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    19. Halvarsson, Daniel, 2013. "Identifying High-Growth Firms," Ratio Working Papers 215, The Ratio Institute.
    20. repec:diw:diwwpp:dp1127 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Bergner, Sören Martin & Bräutigam, Rainer & Evers, Maria Theresia & Spengel, Christoph, 2017. "The use of SME tax incentives in the European Union," ZEW Discussion Papers 17-006, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:12:y:2024:i:3:p:55-:d:1345203. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.