IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jecomi/v12y2024i11p311-d1522064.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost Analysis of Penitentiary Systems and Comparison Between the Countries of the Council of Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Emma Altobelli

    (Department of Life, Public Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy)

  • Antonello Karim Guergache

    (Department of Life, Public Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy)

  • Francesca Galassi

    (Department of Life, Public Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy)

  • Reimondo Petrocelli

    (Department of Preventive Medicine, ASREM, 86039 Termoli, Italy)

  • Ciro Marziliano

    (Statistical Observatory and Indicator Monitoring, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy)

Abstract

Background: The objective was to analyze the budgets invested in prisons by the member states of the Council of Europe (CoE) and the relationships between the global cost, the cost incurred per single inmate, the number of inmates per 100,000 inhabitants (PPR), the gross domestic product (GDP) and per capita GDP. Methods: The data relating to the variables considered for the year 2020 were obtained from the SPACE-I 2021 of the CoE, the World Bank/OECD, and Eurostat. Regression models were used to evaluate the relationships between the PPR and the GDP, the daily cost per prisoner and per capita GDP, and between the PPR and the per capita GDP. A multiple correspondence analysis was performed to evaluate associations between the PPR, EU membership, cost per day, cost rate, geographical area, and inmate gender. Results: The daily expenditure per inmate in northern European countries reaches very high values, respectively: EUR 330.6 (Norway) and EUR 303 (Sweden), while, in the eastern countries, the values drop sharply (EUR 6.50 in Bulgaria and EUR 8.08 in Azerbaijani). The lowest PPR values are found in northern European countries, and the highest in the following countries: Russia, Turkey, Georgia, and Azerbaijan. Conclusions: Countries with a higher GDP per capita tend to have lower prison population rates and to invest larger amounts of funds for prison systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Emma Altobelli & Antonello Karim Guergache & Francesca Galassi & Reimondo Petrocelli & Ciro Marziliano, 2024. "Cost Analysis of Penitentiary Systems and Comparison Between the Countries of the Council of Europe," Economies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-12, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:12:y:2024:i:11:p:311-:d:1522064
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/12/11/311/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/12/11/311/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:12:y:2024:i:11:p:311-:d:1522064. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.