IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jecomi/v12y2024i11p309-d1522030.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Should South Asian Stock Market Investors Think Globally? Investigating Safe Haven Properties and Hedging Effectiveness

Author

Listed:
  • Md. Abu Issa Gazi

    (Faculty of Business and Communications, INTI International University, Persiaran Perdana BBN Putra Nilai, Nilai 71800, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia
    School of Management, Jiujiang University, Jiujiang 332005, China)

  • Md. Nahiduzzaman

    (Department of Finance and Banking, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Science and Technology University, Gopalganj 8100, Bangladesh)

  • Sanjoy Kumar Sarker

    (Department of Finance and Banking, Islamic University, Kushtia 7003, Bangladesh)

  • Mohammad Bin Amin

    (Doctoral School of Management and Business, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary)

  • Md. Ahsan Kabir

    (Department of Statistics and Mathematics, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou 310018, China)

  • Fadoua Kouki

    (Applied Management Program, Applied College at Muhyle, King Khalid University, Abha 61421, Saudi Arabia)

  • Abdul Rahman bin S Senathirajah

    (Faculty of Business and Communications, INTI International University, Persiaran Perdana BBN Putra Nilai, Nilai 71800, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia)

  • László Erdey

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary)

Abstract

In this study, we examine the critical question of whether global equity and bond assets (both green and non-green) offer effective hedging and safe haven properties against stock market risks in South Asia, with a focus on Bangladesh, India, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka. The increasing integration of global financial markets and the volatility experienced during recent economic crises raise important questions regarding the resilience of South Asian markets and the potential protective role of global assets. Drawing on methods like VaR and CVaR tail risk estimators, the DCC-GJR-GARCH time-varying connectedness approach, and cost-effectiveness tools for hedging, we analyze data spanning from 2014 to 2022 to assess these relationships comprehensively. Our findings demonstrate that stock markets in Bangladesh experience lower levels of downside risk in each quantile; however, safe haven properties from the global financial markets are effective for Bangladeshi, Indian, and Pakistani stock markets during the crisis period. Meanwhile, the Sri Lankan stock market neither receives hedging usefulness nor safe haven benefits from the same marketplaces. Additionally, global green assets, specifically green bond assets, are more reliable sources to ensure the safest investment for South Asian investors. Finally, the portfolio implications suggest that while traditional global equity assets offer ideal portfolio weights for South Asian investors, global equity and bond assets (both green and non-green) are the cheapest hedgers for equity investors, particularly in the Bangladeshi, Pakistani, and Sri Lankan stock markets. Moreover, these results hold significant implications for investors seeking to optimize portfolios and manage risk, as well as for policymakers aiming to strengthen regional market resilience. By clarifying the protective capacities of global assets, particularly green ones, our study contributes to a nuanced understanding of portfolio diversification and financial stability strategies within emerging markets in South Asia.

Suggested Citation

  • Md. Abu Issa Gazi & Md. Nahiduzzaman & Sanjoy Kumar Sarker & Mohammad Bin Amin & Md. Ahsan Kabir & Fadoua Kouki & Abdul Rahman bin S Senathirajah & László Erdey, 2024. "Should South Asian Stock Market Investors Think Globally? Investigating Safe Haven Properties and Hedging Effectiveness," Economies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-37, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:12:y:2024:i:11:p:309-:d:1522030
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/12/11/309/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/12/11/309/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:12:y:2024:i:11:p:309-:d:1522030. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.