Author
Listed:
- Leonardo Pestillo de Oliveira
(Graduate Program of Health Promotion, Cesumar Institute of Science, Technology and Innovation, Cesumar University, Maringá 87050-900, Brazil
Associate Postgraduate Program in Physical Education UEM/UEL, State University of Maringá, Maringá 87020-900, Brazil
Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA)
- Nayara Malheiros Caruzzo
(Associate Postgraduate Program in Physical Education UEM/UEL, State University of Maringá, Maringá 87020-900, Brazil
Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA)
- Francis Sakita
(Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, Tanzania)
- Blandina T. Mmbaga
(Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA
Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, Tanzania
Clinical Trial Department, Kilimanjaro Clinical Research Institute, Moshi, Tanzania
Pediatric and Child Health Department, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College, Moshi, Tanzania)
- Judith Boshe
(Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, Tanzania)
- Anna Tupetz
(Duke Emergency Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA)
- Catherine A. Staton
(Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA
Duke Emergency Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA)
- Joao Ricardo Nickenig Vissoci
(Associate Postgraduate Program in Physical Education UEM/UEL, State University of Maringá, Maringá 87020-900, Brazil
Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA
Duke Emergency Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA)
Abstract
Background : There is a lack of tools to screen for health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in acute injury patients, despite the critical need for having a good understanding of the characteristics of mental health during the rehabilitation process. The SF-8 instrument, a shorter version of the SF-36, is the most widely used patient-based assessment of HRQoL. The aim of this research is to adapt the psychometric properties of the SF-8 to Swahili. Methods : This study is a secondary data analysis of previously collected and psychometric evaluation of the culturally adapted and translated SF-8. A cross-cultural adaptation committee carried out the process of translation to provide validity evidence based on test content. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to test the internal structure-based evidence. The validity based on relation to other variables (discriminant evidence) was tested using polychoric correlation with PHQ-2 (Patient Health Questionnaire-2). The reliability was tested using Cronbach’s alpha, Omega McDonald, and Composite Reliability. Results : 1434 adults who suffered an acute injury and presented to the emergency department between April 2018 and August 2020 were included in the study. The instrument demonstrated language clarity and domain coherence, showing validity evidence based on test content. The CFA (Confirmatory Factor Analysis) analysis showed good fit indices for both models (one- and two-factor models) of the SF-8. The discriminant evidence showed that SF-8 scores correlate strongly with the PHQ-2 instrument. These results supported the validity evidence in relation to other variables. All analyses of reliability were considered adequate with values above 0.90 for both models of the SF-8. Conclusions : The results show that the SF-8 instrument can provide relevant information about the health-related quality of life of acute injury patients, and allow practitioners to gain a better understanding of mental health, improving the treatment and follow-up of injury patients within Tanzanian culture.
Suggested Citation
Leonardo Pestillo de Oliveira & Nayara Malheiros Caruzzo & Francis Sakita & Blandina T. Mmbaga & Judith Boshe & Anna Tupetz & Catherine A. Staton & Joao Ricardo Nickenig Vissoci, 2022.
"Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the SF-8 Questionnaire in Tanzanian Swahili for Injury Population,"
Disabilities, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-11, July.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jdisab:v:2:y:2022:i:3:p:30-438:d:869840
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jdisab:v:2:y:2022:i:3:p:30-438:d:869840. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.