IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jcltec/v5y2023i2p33-674d1148850.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Material Flow Cost Accounting as a Resource-Saving Tool for Emerging Recycling Technologies

Author

Listed:
  • Caitlin Walls

    (ABCircular GmbH, Magnusstraße 11, 12489 Berlin, Germany
    Institute of Applied Resource Strategies IARS, SRH Berlin University of Applied Sciences, Ernst-Reuter-Platz 10, 10587 Berlin, Germany)

  • Almy Ruzni Keumala Putri

    (Institute of Applied Resource Strategies IARS, SRH Berlin University of Applied Sciences, Ernst-Reuter-Platz 10, 10587 Berlin, Germany)

  • Gesa Beck

    (ABCircular GmbH, Magnusstraße 11, 12489 Berlin, Germany
    Institute of Applied Resource Strategies IARS, SRH Berlin University of Applied Sciences, Ernst-Reuter-Platz 10, 10587 Berlin, Germany
    Fraunhofer Applied Research Center for Resource Efficiency ARess, Brentanostr. 2a, 63755 Alzenau, Germany)

Abstract

Material Flow Cost Accounting (MFCA) is an environmental management accounting method that allocates costs to material and energy flows through a process, thereby enabling a simultaneous reduction in environmental impacts alongside an improvement in business and economic efficiency. This study illustrates the versatility of MFCA beyond its usual application to existing production and manufacturing processes. In this paper, MFCA is used to assess the financial viability of two emerging recycling technologies, IRETA2 (Development and Evaluation of Recycling Routes to Recover Tantalum from Electronic Waste) and ReComp (Development of an Innovative, Economically and Ecologically Sensible Recycling Method for Metallised ABS and PC/ABS Composite Waste). These two projects differ in their process structure. Whilst IRETA2 is a strictly linear recycling process, ReComp consists of two process streams, split according to the treatment of its two material fractions. For both projects, the lab-scale experimental results were used to develop an MFCA model of the recycling process scaled at each project partner’s facilities. MFCA was utilised to calculate the projects’ overall profit or loss, the impact of the final products’ market conditions and processing rate (in the case of IRETA2), or machinery capacity (for ReComp) on the overall results. The results show that neither IRETA2 nor ReComp are financially viable based on the current output products’ market value and quantity produced. However, through a sensitivity analysis, it is demonstrated that IRETA2 could become financially viable if the processing rate or market conditions were to improve. Additionally, ReComp could become financially viable if there was an increase in machine capacity. Finally, this paper also explores possible implications of MFCA when applied to emerging recycling technologies on EU policy and strategy, particularly those related to the EU Green Deal, such as extended producer responsibility and supply chain acts.

Suggested Citation

  • Caitlin Walls & Almy Ruzni Keumala Putri & Gesa Beck, 2023. "Material Flow Cost Accounting as a Resource-Saving Tool for Emerging Recycling Technologies," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-23, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jcltec:v:5:y:2023:i:2:p:33-674:d:1148850
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-8797/5/2/33/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-8797/5/2/33/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thuy Thanh Tran & Christian Herzig, 2020. "Material Flow Cost Accounting in Developing Countries: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Shaio Yan Huang & An An Chiu & Po Chi Chao & Ni Wang, 2019. "The Application of Material Flow Cost Accounting in Waste Reduction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-27, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jui-Che Tu & Hsieh-Shan Huang, 2019. "Relationship between Green Design and Material Flow Cost Accounting in the Context of Effective Resource Utilization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-15, April.
    2. Thuy Thanh Tran & Christian Herzig, 2020. "Material Flow Cost Accounting in Developing Countries: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-18, July.
    3. Ghani, Latifah Abdul & Mahmood, Noor Zalina, 2023. "Modeling domestic wastewater pathways on household system using the socio-MFA techniques," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 480(C).
    4. Chris A. Kelsall, 2020. "Ecological Management Accounting—Taking into Account Sustainability, Does Accounting Have Far to Travel?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-20, October.
    5. Sanhong Liu & Ying Xie & Wen Liang, 2024. "Optimisation of the Circular Economy Based on the Resource Circulation Equation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-23, July.
    6. Tran, Thuy Thanh & Herzig, Christian, 2021. "Improving decision-making through material flow cost accounting: the case of VietGreen bottled mineral water company," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 25(1), August.
    7. Silas Mukwarami & Chekani Nkwaira & Huibrecht Margaretha van der Poll, 2023. "Environmental Management Accounting Implementation Challenges and Supply Chain Management in Emerging Economies’ Manufacturing Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-18, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jcltec:v:5:y:2023:i:2:p:33-674:d:1148850. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.