IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jchals/v11y2020i2p18-d401519.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Considerations for Comparing Video Game AI Agents with Humans

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher R. Madan

    (School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK)

Abstract

Video games are sometimes used as environments to evaluate AI agents’ ability to develop and execute complex action sequences to maximize a defined reward. However, humans cannot match the fine precision of the timed actions of AI agents; in games such as StarCraft, build orders take the place of chess opening gambits. However, unlike strategy games, such as chess and Go, video games also rely heavily on sensorimotor precision. If the “finding” was merely that AI agents have superhuman reaction times and precision, none would be surprised. The goal is rather to look at adaptive reasoning and strategies produced by AI agents that may replicate human approaches or even result in strategies not previously produced by humans. Here, I will provide: (1) an overview of observations where AI agents are perhaps not being fairly evaluated relative to humans, (2) a potential approach for making this comparison more appropriate, and (3) highlight some important recent advances in video game play provided by AI agents.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher R. Madan, 2020. "Considerations for Comparing Video Game AI Agents with Humans," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-12, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jchals:v:11:y:2020:i:2:p:18-:d:401519
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2078-1547/11/2/18/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2078-1547/11/2/18/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anthony M. Zador, 2019. "A critique of pure learning and what artificial neural networks can learn from animal brains," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-7, December.
    2. Julian Schrittwieser & Ioannis Antonoglou & Thomas Hubert & Karen Simonyan & Laurent Sifre & Simon Schmitt & Arthur Guez & Edward Lockhart & Demis Hassabis & Thore Graepel & Timothy Lillicrap & David , 2020. "Mastering Atari, Go, chess and shogi by planning with a learned model," Nature, Nature, vol. 588(7839), pages 604-609, December.
    3. David Silver & Julian Schrittwieser & Karen Simonyan & Ioannis Antonoglou & Aja Huang & Arthur Guez & Thomas Hubert & Lucas Baker & Matthew Lai & Adrian Bolton & Yutian Chen & Timothy Lillicrap & Fan , 2017. "Mastering the game of Go without human knowledge," Nature, Nature, vol. 550(7676), pages 354-359, October.
    4. Volodymyr Mnih & Koray Kavukcuoglu & David Silver & Andrei A. Rusu & Joel Veness & Marc G. Bellemare & Alex Graves & Martin Riedmiller & Andreas K. Fidjeland & Georg Ostrovski & Stig Petersen & Charle, 2015. "Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning," Nature, Nature, vol. 518(7540), pages 529-533, February.
    5. David Silver & Aja Huang & Chris J. Maddison & Arthur Guez & Laurent Sifre & George van den Driessche & Julian Schrittwieser & Ioannis Antonoglou & Veda Panneershelvam & Marc Lanctot & Sander Dieleman, 2016. "Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search," Nature, Nature, vol. 529(7587), pages 484-489, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Wenqing & Ni, Shaoquan, 2022. "Train timetabling with the general learning environment and multi-agent deep reinforcement learning," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 230-251.
    2. De Moor, Bram J. & Gijsbrechts, Joren & Boute, Robert N., 2022. "Reward shaping to improve the performance of deep reinforcement learning in perishable inventory management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(2), pages 535-545.
    3. Huang, Ruchen & He, Hongwen & Gao, Miaojue, 2023. "Training-efficient and cost-optimal energy management for fuel cell hybrid electric bus based on a novel distributed deep reinforcement learning framework," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 346(C).
    4. Omar Al-Ani & Sanjoy Das, 2022. "Reinforcement Learning: Theory and Applications in HEMS," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-37, September.
    5. Boute, Robert N. & Gijsbrechts, Joren & van Jaarsveld, Willem & Vanvuchelen, Nathalie, 2022. "Deep reinforcement learning for inventory control: A roadmap," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(2), pages 401-412.
    6. Zhang, Yihao & Chai, Zhaojie & Lykotrafitis, George, 2021. "Deep reinforcement learning with a particle dynamics environment applied to emergency evacuation of a room with obstacles," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 571(C).
    7. Weifan Long & Taixian Hou & Xiaoyi Wei & Shichao Yan & Peng Zhai & Lihua Zhang, 2023. "A Survey on Population-Based Deep Reinforcement Learning," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-17, May.
    8. Yifeng Guo & Xingyu Fu & Yuyan Shi & Mingwen Liu, 2018. "Robust Log-Optimal Strategy with Reinforcement Learning," Papers 1805.00205, arXiv.org.
    9. Yuchao Dong, 2022. "Randomized Optimal Stopping Problem in Continuous time and Reinforcement Learning Algorithm," Papers 2208.02409, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2023.
    10. Shijun Wang & Baocheng Zhu & Chen Li & Mingzhe Wu & James Zhang & Wei Chu & Yuan Qi, 2020. "Riemannian Proximal Policy Optimization," Computer and Information Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(3), pages 1-93, August.
    11. Christoph Graf & Viktor Zobernig & Johannes Schmidt & Claude Klockl, 2021. "Computational Performance of Deep Reinforcement Learning to find Nash Equilibria," Papers 2104.12895, arXiv.org.
    12. Iwao Maeda & David deGraw & Michiharu Kitano & Hiroyasu Matsushima & Hiroki Sakaji & Kiyoshi Izumi & Atsuo Kato, 2020. "Deep Reinforcement Learning in Agent Based Financial Market Simulation," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, April.
    13. Bálint Kővári & Lászlo Szőke & Tamás Bécsi & Szilárd Aradi & Péter Gáspár, 2021. "Traffic Signal Control via Reinforcement Learning for Reducing Global Vehicle Emission," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-18, October.
    14. Bo Hu & Jiaxi Li & Shuang Li & Jie Yang, 2019. "A Hybrid End-to-End Control Strategy Combining Dueling Deep Q-network and PID for Transient Boost Control of a Diesel Engine with Variable Geometry Turbocharger and Cooled EGR," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-15, September.
    15. Elsisi, Mahmoud & Amer, Mohammed & Dababat, Alya’ & Su, Chun-Lien, 2023. "A comprehensive review of machine learning and IoT solutions for demand side energy management, conservation, and resilient operation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    16. Lai, Jianfa & Weng, Lin-Chen & Peng, Xiaoling & Fang, Kai-Tai, 2022. "Construction of symmetric orthogonal designs with deep Q-network and orthogonal complementary design," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    17. Jin, Jiahuan & Cui, Tianxiang & Bai, Ruibin & Qu, Rong, 2024. "Container port truck dispatching optimization using Real2Sim based deep reinforcement learning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(1), pages 161-175.
    18. Ricardo S. Alonso & Inés Sittón-Candanedo & Roberto Casado-Vara & Javier Prieto & Juan M. Corchado, 2020. "Deep Reinforcement Learning for the Management of Software-Defined Networks and Network Function Virtualization in an Edge-IoT Architecture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-23, July.
    19. Zechu Li & Xiao-Yang Liu & Jiahao Zheng & Zhaoran Wang & Anwar Walid & Jian Guo, 2021. "FinRL-Podracer: High Performance and Scalable Deep Reinforcement Learning for Quantitative Finance," Papers 2111.05188, arXiv.org.
    20. Christoph Graf & Viktor Zobernig & Johannes Schmidt & Claude Klöckl, 2024. "Computational Performance of Deep Reinforcement Learning to Find Nash Equilibria," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 63(2), pages 529-576, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jchals:v:11:y:2020:i:2:p:18-:d:401519. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.