IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v8y2018i5p66-d143835.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Salt Tolerance of Six Switchgrass Cultivars

Author

Listed:
  • Youping Sun

    (Department of Plants, Soils and Climate, Utah State University, 4820 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322, USA)

  • Genhua Niu

    (Texas A&M AgriLife Research Center at El Paso, Texas A&M University System, 1380 A&M Circle, El Paso, TX 79927, USA)

  • Girisha Ganjegunte

    (Texas A&M AgriLife Research Center at El Paso, Texas A&M University System, 1380 A&M Circle, El Paso, TX 79927, USA)

  • Yanqi Wu

    (Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74074, USA)

Abstract

Panicum virgatum L. (switchgrass) cultivars (‘Alamo’, ‘Cimarron’, ‘Kanlow’, ‘NL 94C2-3’, ‘NSL 2009-1’, and ‘NSL 2009-2’) were evaluated for salt tolerance in two separate greenhouse experiments. In experiment (Expt.) 1, switchgrass seedlings were irrigated with a nutrient solution at an electrical conductivity (EC) of 1.2 dS·m −1 (control) or a saline solution (spiked with salts) at an EC of 5.0 dS·m −1 (EC 5) or 10.0 dS·m −1 (EC 10) for four weeks, once a week. Treatment EC 10 reduced the tiller number by 32% to 37% for all switchgrass cultivars except ‘Kanlow’. All switchgrass cultivars under EC 10 had a significant reduction of 50% to 63% in dry weight. In Expt. 2, switchgrass was seeded in substrates moistened with either a nutrient solution of EC 1.2 dS·m −1 (control) or a saline solution of EC of 5.0, 10.0, or 20.0 dS·m −1 (EC 5, EC 10, or EC 20). Treatment EC 5 did not affect the seedling emergence, regardless of cultivar. Compared to the control, EC 10 reduced the seedling emergence of switchgrass ‘Alamo’, ‘Cimarron’, and ‘NL 94C2-3’ by 44%, 33%, and 82%, respectively. All switchgrass cultivars under EC 10 had a 46% to 88% reduction in the seedling emergence index except ‘NSL 2009-2’. No switchgrass seedlings emerged under EC 20. In summary, high salinity negatively affected switchgrass seedling emergence and growth. Dendrogram and cluster of six switchgrass cultivars indicated that ‘Alamo’ was the most tolerant cultivar, while ‘NSL 2009-2’ was the least tolerant cultivar at both seedling emergence and growth stages. A growth-stage dependent response to salinity was observed for the remaining switchgrass cultivars. ‘NSL 2009-1’ and ‘NL 94C2-3’ were more tolerant to salinity than ‘Cimarron’ and ‘Kanlow’ at the seedling emergence stage; however, ‘Kanlow’ and ‘Cimarron’ were more tolerant to salinity than ‘NSL 2009-1’ and ‘NL 94C2-3’ at the seedling growth stage.

Suggested Citation

  • Youping Sun & Genhua Niu & Girisha Ganjegunte & Yanqi Wu, 2018. "Salt Tolerance of Six Switchgrass Cultivars," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-11, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:8:y:2018:i:5:p:66-:d:143835
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/8/5/66/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/8/5/66/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Katharine Sanderson, 2006. "A field in ferment," Nature, Nature, vol. 444(7120), pages 673-676, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ángel Cordero & Idoia Garmendia & Bruce A. Osborne, 2019. "Interspecific Variations in the Growth, Water Relations and Photosynthetic Responses of Switchgrass Genotypes to Salinity Targets Salt Exclusion for Maximising Bioenergy Production," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-19, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gupta, Anubhuti & Verma, Jay Prakash, 2015. "Sustainable bio-ethanol production from agro-residues: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 550-567.
    2. Kessler, Jeff & Sperling, Daniel, 2016. "Tracking U.S. biofuel innovation through patents," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 97-107.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:8:y:2018:i:5:p:66-:d:143835. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.