IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v8y2018i10p157-d174005.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Use of Leaf and Fruit Morphometric Analysis to Identify and Classify White Mulberry ( Morus alba L.) Genotypes

Author

Listed:
  • Riccardo Lo Bianco

    (Department of Agricultural, Food and Forest Sciences (SAAF), University of Palermo, 90128 Palermo, Italy)

  • Fabio Mirabella

    (Department of Agricultural, Food and Forest Sciences (SAAF), University of Palermo, 90128 Palermo, Italy)

Abstract

Digital image analysis and multivariate data analysis were used in this study to identify a set of leaf and fruit morphometric traits to discriminate white mulberry ( Morus alba L.) cultivars. The trial was conducted using three- to five-year-old potted cuttings of several white mulberry cultivars. 32 leaf morphometric descriptors were recorded in 2011 and 2012 from 11 mulberry cultivars using image analysis of scanned leaves, whereas six fruit descriptors were recorded in 2011 from nine mulberry cultivars. Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) was used to identify a subset of measured variables that could discriminate the cultivars in trial. Biplot analysis, followed by cluster analysis, was performed on the discriminant variables to investigate any possible cultivar grouping based on similar morphometric traits. LDA was able to discriminate the 11 cultivars with a canonical function, which included 13 leaf descriptors. Using those 13 descriptors, the Biplot showed that over 84% of the variability could be explained by the first three factors. Clustering of standardized biplot coordinates recognized three groups: the first including ‘Korinne’ and ‘Miura’ with similar leaf angles and apical tooth size; the second including ‘Cattaneo’, ‘Florio’, ‘Kokusò-21’, ‘Kokusò-27’, and ‘Kokusò Rosso’ with similar leaf size and shape; and the third including ‘Ichinose’, ‘Kayrio’, ‘Morettiana’, and ‘Restelli’, with similar leaf margin. Fruit descriptors were fewer and measured on fewer cultivars, yielding smaller discriminatory power than leaf descriptors. Use of leaf morphometric descriptors, along with image and multivariate analysis, proved to be effective for discriminating mulberry cultivars and showed promise for the implementation of a simple and inexpensive characterization and classification tool.

Suggested Citation

  • Riccardo Lo Bianco & Fabio Mirabella, 2018. "Use of Leaf and Fruit Morphometric Analysis to Identify and Classify White Mulberry ( Morus alba L.) Genotypes," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-9, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:8:y:2018:i:10:p:157-:d:174005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/8/10/157/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/8/10/157/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vittorio Farina & Riccardo Lo Bianco & Agata Mazzaglia, 2019. "Evaluation of Late-Maturing Peach and Nectarine Fruit Quality by Chemical, Physical, and Sensory Determinations," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-11, September.
    2. Vitale Nuzzo & Antonio Gatto & Giuseppe Montanaro, 2022. "Morphological Characterization of Some Local Varieties of Fig ( Ficus carica L.) Cultivated in Southern Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-22, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:8:y:2018:i:10:p:157-:d:174005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.