Author
Listed:
- María Aparicio-Arnay
(Animal Data Analytics, S.L., C/Dámaso Alonso, 14, 40006 Segovia, Spain
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, UCM, Ciudad Universitaria s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain)
- Natalia Yeste-Vizcaíno
(Cuarte S.L., Grupo Jorge, Ctra. de Logroño km 9.2, Monzalbarba, 50120 Zaragoza, Spain
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, UAB, 08193 Cerdanyola del Vallés, Spain)
- Nerea Soria
(Cuarte S.L., Grupo Jorge, Ctra. de Logroño km 9.2, Monzalbarba, 50120 Zaragoza, Spain)
- Jorge Cambra
(Cuarte S.L., Grupo Jorge, Ctra. de Logroño km 9.2, Monzalbarba, 50120 Zaragoza, Spain)
- Beatriz Isabel
(Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, UCM, Ciudad Universitaria s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain)
- Carlos Piñeiro
(Animal Data Analytics, S.L., C/Dámaso Alonso, 14, 40006 Segovia, Spain)
- Antonio Gonzalez-Bulnes
(Cuarte S.L., Grupo Jorge, Ctra. de Logroño km 9.2, Monzalbarba, 50120 Zaragoza, Spain
Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, Universidad Cardenal Herrera—CEU, CEU Universities, C/Tirant lo Blanc, 7, 46115 Alfara del Patriarca, Spain)
Abstract
The use of electronic sow feeders (ESFs) during lactation has been associated with weaning of heavier piglets when compared to traditional feeders, with a lower amount of sow feed per kg of weaned piglet, improved welfare of the sow, and no negative effects on body condition or metabolic traits at weaning or subsequent reproductive yields. However, there have been no studies assessing the possible effects of ESF use on the lifelong development of the progeny. This study reveals that piglets weaned from sows fed with ESFs were heavier than those from sows fed with traditional feeders (5.91 ± 1.45 vs. 5.58 ± 1.23 kg, p < 0.005), with a lower amount of feed per kg of weaned piglet (2.41 ± 0.42 vs. 1.88 ± 0.28 kg, p < 0.0005). Subsequent differences in body weight increased due to a higher average daily weight gain during both the periods of nursery (0.332 ± 0.92 vs. 0.312 ± 0.80 kg/day, p < 0.01) and growing–finishing (0.921 ± 0.11 vs. 0.871 ± 0.09 kg/day, p < 0.001). Finally, the weights of the carcasses and primal pork pieces (ham, shoulder, loin, and belly) were also higher in pigs from sows fed with ESFs ( p < 0.001 for all).
Suggested Citation
María Aparicio-Arnay & Natalia Yeste-Vizcaíno & Nerea Soria & Jorge Cambra & Beatriz Isabel & Carlos Piñeiro & Antonio Gonzalez-Bulnes, 2025.
"Precision Feeding in Lactating Sows Improves Growth Performance and Carcass Quality of Their Progeny,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-10, April.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:8:p:887-:d:1637907
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:8:p:887-:d:1637907. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.