Author
Listed:
- Tantan Jin
(Interdisciplinary Program in Smart Agriculture, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Republic of Korea)
- Su Min Kang
(Department of Biosystems Engineering, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Republic of Korea)
- Na Rin Kim
(Department of Biosystems Engineering, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Republic of Korea)
- Hye Ryeong Kim
(Department of Biosystems Engineering, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Republic of Korea)
- Xiongzhe Han
(Interdisciplinary Program in Smart Agriculture, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Republic of Korea
Department of Biosystems Engineering, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Republic of Korea)
Abstract
Efficient pest control in orchards is crucial for preserving crop quality and maximizing yield. A key factor in optimizing automated variable-rate spraying is accurate tree canopy size estimation, which helps reduce pesticide overuse while minimizing environmental and health risks. This study evaluates the performance of two advanced convolutional neural networks, PP-LiteSeg and fully convolutional networks (FCNs), for segmenting tree canopies of varying sizes—small, medium, and large—using short-term dense-connection networks (STDC1 and STDC2) as backbones. A dataset of 305 field-collected images was used for model training and evaluation. The results show that FCNs with STDC backbones outperform PP-LiteSeg, delivering superior semantic segmentation accuracy and background classification. The STDC1-based model excels in precision variable-rate spraying, achieving an Intersection-over-Union of up to 0.75, Recall of 0.85, and Precision of approximately 0.85. Meanwhile, the STDC2-based model demonstrates greater optimization stability and faster convergence, making it more suitable for resource-constrained environments. Notably, the STDC2-based model significantly enhances canopy-background differentiation, achieving a background classification Recall of 0.9942. In contrast, PP-LiteSeg struggles with small canopy detection, leading to reduced segmentation accuracy. These findings highlight the potential of FCNs with STDC backbones for automated apple tree canopy recognition, advancing precision agriculture and promoting sustainable pesticide application through improved variable-rate spraying strategies.
Suggested Citation
Tantan Jin & Su Min Kang & Na Rin Kim & Hye Ryeong Kim & Xiongzhe Han, 2025.
"Comparative Analysis of CNN-Based Semantic Segmentation for Apple Tree Canopy Size Recognition in Automated Variable-Rate Spraying,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-19, April.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:7:p:789-:d:1628933
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:7:p:789-:d:1628933. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.