Author
Listed:
- Hua Zhu
(School of Geomatics, Zhejiang University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Hangzhou 310018, China)
- Qing Zhang
(School of Geomatics, Zhejiang University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Hangzhou 310018, China)
- Junfeng Xiong
(State Key Laboratory of Lake and Watershed Science for Water Security, Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 211135, China)
Abstract
Managing agricultural water pollution (AWP) and agricultural carbon emissions (ACE) together is crucial for addressing the global water resources crisis and climate challenges. Traditional water quality indicators are limited in large-scale evaluations of AWP. The common trends of ACE and AWP, as well as the spatial heterogeneity of their common driving factors also remain unclear. This study introduces a novel framework for analyzing the synergistic reduction of AWP and ACE from the perspective of agricultural grey water footprint (AGWF) and examines disparities in common driving factors across areas with differing levels of economic development and pollution intensities in Zhejiang Province. The results indicate that ACE and AGWF in Zhejiang showed an upward trend from 2010 to 2012, followed by a significant decline from 2013 to 2020. A consistent synergistic reduction trend in grey water footprint and carbon emissions was identified in both the planting and livestock husbandry sectors across Zhejiang. Socio-economic factors jointly influenced the reductions in ACE and AGWF, with technological level and the labor-to-research-and-development (labor-R&D) ratio being the primary drivers, accounting for 79.41% and 78.38% of these reductions, respectively. The impact of agricultural R&D expenditure intensity on AGWF and ACE exhibited spatiotemporal heterogeneity and sectoral disparities. The key to promoting the synergistic reduction of AGWF and ACE lies in advancing the research, development, and application of green agricultural technologies especially in regions where such technologies are not yet fully developed. The results provide a theoretical framework and practical implementation for the integrated management of AWP and ACE, as well as sustainable agricultural policy formulation.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:7:p:782-:d:1628135. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.