IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2025i7p773-d1626983.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Calibration of Parameters for Leaf-Stem-Cutting Model of Tuber Mustard ( Brassica juncea L.) Based on Discrete Element Method

Author

Listed:
  • Man Gu

    (Nanjing Institute of Agricultural Mechanization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Nanjing 210014, China
    College of Mechanical Engineering, Henan Polytechnic Institute, Nanyang 473000, China)

  • Haiyang Shen

    (Nanjing Institute of Agricultural Mechanization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Nanjing 210014, China)

  • Weiwen Luo

    (Nanjing Institute of Agricultural Mechanization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Nanjing 210014, China)

  • Jie Ling

    (Nanjing Institute of Agricultural Mechanization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Nanjing 210014, China)

  • Bokai Wang

    (Nanjing Institute of Agricultural Mechanization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Nanjing 210014, China)

  • Fengwei Gu

    (Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Shumin Song

    (Chongqing Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chongqing 401329, China)

  • Liang Pan

    (Chongqing Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chongqing 401329, China)

  • Zhichao Hu

    (Nanjing Institute of Agricultural Mechanization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Nanjing 210014, China)

Abstract

The cutting of leaf stems is a critical step in the mechanized harvesting of tuber mustard ( Brassica juncea L.). This study focuses on the calibration of parameters for the discrete element model of mustard leaf stems to visualize the cutting process and facilitate numerical simulations. Intrinsic material properties were measured based on mechanical testing, and EDEM2022 simulation software was utilized to calibrate the model parameters. The Hertz–Mindlin (no-slip) model was employed to simulate the stacking angle of mustard leaf stems, and the contact parameters for the discrete element model were determined using a combination of two-level factorial design, steepest ascent, and CCD (central composite design) tests. The results showed that the coefficient of restitution, coefficient of static friction, and coefficient of rolling friction for the leaf stems were 0.45, 0.457, and 0.167, respectively, while for interactions between the leaf stems and the working parts, these values were 0.45, 0.55, and 0.175, respectively. Based on the Hertz–Mindlin with bonding model, the primary bonding parameters were calculated, and a BBD (Box–Behnken design) test was applied for optimization. The comparison between the simulation and experimental results showed that the relative error in the maximum shear force was within 5%, indicating that the calibrated model can serve as a reliable theoretical reference for the design and optimization of tuber mustard harvesting and cutting equipment.

Suggested Citation

  • Man Gu & Haiyang Shen & Weiwen Luo & Jie Ling & Bokai Wang & Fengwei Gu & Shumin Song & Liang Pan & Zhichao Hu, 2025. "Calibration of Parameters for Leaf-Stem-Cutting Model of Tuber Mustard ( Brassica juncea L.) Based on Discrete Element Method," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-19, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:7:p:773-:d:1626983
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/7/773/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/7/773/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:7:p:773-:d:1626983. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.