Author
Listed:
- Eman Barkat
(Harry Butler Institute, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Xin Du
(Harry Butler Institute, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
School of College of Environmental and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, South Street, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Jun-Ran Kim
(Department of Plant Quarantine, Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency (APQA), Gimcheon 39660, Republic of Korea)
- Zhengyan Wang
(School of College of Environmental and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, South Street, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
School of Food and Strategic Reserves, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450001, China)
- Byung-Ho Lee
(Institute of Agricultural and Life Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Republic of Korea)
- Abrar Uaraboa
(School of Biomedical, Science, Curtin University, Kent St, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia)
- Esra Uaraboa
(School of Pharmacy, Curtin University, Kent St, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia)
- Bong-Su Kim
(Department of Plant Quarantine, Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency (APQA), Gimcheon 39660, Republic of Korea)
Abstract
Fungi can degrade grain quality, produce harmful mycotoxins, and hinder germination in the post-harvest stage, resulting in significant economic losses. Ethyl formate (EF) is an efficient and eco-friendly fumigant for controlling pest insects in grains, horticulture, and quarantine treatments. However, there is a lack of research on the antifungal activity of EF and its degradation products on barley seeds. In this study, fifteen fungal species, predominantly Alternaria infectoria , were isolated and identified from seven Australian barley samples. Efficacy results indicated that EF significantly inhibited fungal growth at a commercial concentration of 2.4 mmol/L, except for Penicillium sp. 2, Fusarium chlamydosporum , and Rhizopus arrhizus . To control these EF-tolerant fungal species, the EF concentration was increased to 5 mmol/L, which achieved a 100% inhibition rate. The degradation product of EF, formic acid, effectively inhibited all EF-tolerant fungi, requiring only 0.08 mmol/L in the in vitro study. There were no significant differences in vigor and germination rates in barley treated with EF at concentrations of 2.5, 3.7, and 5 mmol/L. Additionally, EF treatments led to a significant increase in the barley root length from an average of 9.1 cm in the control group to 13.2, 13. 6, and 12.3 cm at 2.5, 3.7, and 5 mmol/L. The findings suggest that EF could be a suitable alternative fumigant to safeguard grain from fungal infestation, particularly in the context of advancing agricultural practices and improving seed germination quality. The degradation compound, formic acid, may contribute significantly to the overall antifungal function of ethyl formate fumigation, particularly in high-humidity environments.
Suggested Citation
Eman Barkat & Xin Du & Jun-Ran Kim & Zhengyan Wang & Byung-Ho Lee & Abrar Uaraboa & Esra Uaraboa & Bong-Su Kim, 2025.
"A Novel Approach for Fungal Control with Ethyl Formate in Barley and Its Impact on Germination,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-14, March.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:7:p:748-:d:1624936
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:7:p:748-:d:1624936. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.