Author
Listed:
- Wangmei Feng
(School of Life Sciences and Engineering, Northwest Minzu University, Lanzhou 730030, China
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Juanshan Zheng
(School of Life Sciences and Engineering, Northwest Minzu University, Lanzhou 730030, China
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Na Jiao
(School of Life Sciences and Engineering, Northwest Minzu University, Lanzhou 730030, China)
- Chi Ma
(School of Life Sciences and Engineering, Northwest Minzu University, Lanzhou 730030, China)
- Honghe Li
(School of Life Sciences and Engineering, Northwest Minzu University, Lanzhou 730030, China)
- Junsong Zhang
(School of Life Sciences and Engineering, Northwest Minzu University, Lanzhou 730030, China)
- Jutian Yang
(School of Life Sciences and Engineering, Northwest Minzu University, Lanzhou 730030, China)
- Hongwei Xu
(School of Life Sciences and Engineering, Northwest Minzu University, Lanzhou 730030, China)
- Yong Cai
(School of Life Sciences and Engineering, Northwest Minzu University, Lanzhou 730030, China)
- Dandan Gao
(School of Life Sciences and Engineering, Northwest Minzu University, Lanzhou 730030, China)
- Xin Cao
(School of Life Sciences and Engineering, Northwest Minzu University, Lanzhou 730030, China)
- Xiaofang Feng
(School of Life Sciences and Engineering, Northwest Minzu University, Lanzhou 730030, China)
- Penghui Guo
(School of Life Sciences and Engineering, Northwest Minzu University, Lanzhou 730030, China)
Abstract
This study sought to investigate the impact of different levels of dietary maintenance energy metabolism on nutrient digestibility, rumen microbiota composition, and serum biochemical parameters in Lanzhou fat-tailed sheep rams. A total of twenty rams, each aged eight months and with an initial mean body weight of 27.81 ± 3.38 kg, were selected and randomly assigned to one of four experimental groups. These groups were administered with different levels of metabolizable energy (MEM): low energy (LE), intermediate energy (IE), high energy (HE), and extra high energy (EHE), corresponding to 6.77, 7.22, 7.72, and 8.20 MJ/d, respectively. The results showed a linear increase ( p < 0.001) in average daily gain (ADG), dry matter (DM) intake, apparent DM digestibility, and crude protein (CP) digestibility. Conversely, the intake of nitrogen (NI), fecal nitrogen (FN), and manure nitrogen (MN) exhibited a significant linear decrease ( p < 0.001). The N utilization efficiency rations of FN/NI and MN/NI linearly decreased ( p < 0.001), while RN/NI linearly increased ( p < 0.001). Additionally, the intake of gross energy (GE), methane energy (CH4-E), digestible energy (DE), and metabolizable energy (ME) exhibited a linear increase, whereas the ration of FE/GE intake linearly decreased ( p < 0.001). The efficiency of energy utilization expressed as a proportion of GE intake (DE/GE intake, ME/GE intake, ME/DE intake, and CH4-E/GE intake) showed linear alterations ( p < 0.05) with the increase in the dietary energy supplementation level. The dietary energy level did not exert a significant impact on serum biochemical indices ( p > 0.05). At the phylum level, the average abundances of Verrucomicrobiota were significantly reduced in the EHE group compared to the IE group, while the average abundances of Desulfobacterota were significantly lower in the EHE group relative to the LE group. At the genus level, the average abundances of Succiniclasticum were significantly higher in the HE and EHE groups compared to the LE group. In conclusion, the energy level (8.20 MJ/d) significantly enhanced nutrient digestibility, energy, and nitrogen metabolism, and it significantly increased the relative abundances of Succiniclasticum .
Suggested Citation
Wangmei Feng & Juanshan Zheng & Na Jiao & Chi Ma & Honghe Li & Junsong Zhang & Jutian Yang & Hongwei Xu & Yong Cai & Dandan Gao & Xin Cao & Xiaofang Feng & Penghui Guo, 2025.
"Effects of Energy Intake on Nutrient Digestibility, Nitrogen Metabolism, Energy Utilization, Serum Biochemical Indices, and Rumen Microbiota in Lanzhou Fat-Tailed Sheep,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-16, March.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:7:p:698-:d:1620618
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:7:p:698-:d:1620618. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.