IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2025i6p593-d1609770.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Certain Physiological and Chemical Indicators Drive the Yield and Quality of Cladode Mucilage in Three Fodder Nopal Morphotypes ( Opuntia spp.) Under Different Soil Water Content Conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Aurelio Pedroza-Sandoval

    (Unidad Regional Universitaria de Zonas Áridas, Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, Km. 40 Carretera Gómez Palacio—Chihuahua, Bermejillo C.P. 35230, Durango, Mexico)

  • Luis Ángel González-Espíndola

    (Unidad Regional Universitaria de Zonas Áridas, Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, Km. 40 Carretera Gómez Palacio—Chihuahua, Bermejillo C.P. 35230, Durango, Mexico)

  • Isaac Gramillo-Ávila

    (Unidad Regional Universitaria de Zonas Áridas, Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, Km. 40 Carretera Gómez Palacio—Chihuahua, Bermejillo C.P. 35230, Durango, Mexico)

  • José Antonio Miranda-Rojas

    (Unidad Regional Universitaria de Zonas Áridas, Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, Km. 40 Carretera Gómez Palacio—Chihuahua, Bermejillo C.P. 35230, Durango, Mexico)

Abstract

Nopal cladode mucilage is a product of great importance in fodder, agri-food, industry, and health areas. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of three soil moisture contents on some physiological and chemical variables associated with the mucilage yield and quality of three morphotypes of fodder nopal ( Opuntia spp.). A randomized block experimental design in a split–split plot arrangement with three replicates was used. The large plots represented the following soil moisture contents (SMC): optimum soil moisture content (OSMC) from 22 to 27%; suboptimum soil moisture content (SSMC) from 16 to 21%; and deficient soil moisture content (DSMC) from 10 to 15%. The subplots consisted of three cactus pear genotypes identified by the following IDs: C-CH, -C-NA, and C-HE. The relative water content (RWC) was significantly higher in the C-HE morphotype across each soil moisture content, and the lowest value was recorded in C-NA with OSMC; -C-CH had the lowest values in SSMC and DSMC, with 71.3% and 44.3%, respectively. There were slight variations in chlorophyll with SSMC; the C-NA and C-CH morphotypes had significantly higher chlorophyll contents, with values of 10.3 mg g −1 100 FW of chlorophyll a. and 5.87 mg 100 g −1 FW of chlorophyll b . The C-CH morphotype had the best mucilage yield, with 800 mL kg −1 FW and 712.6 mL kg −1 FW in OSMC and SSMC, respectively; DSMC showed the lowest yield at 552.3 mL kg −1 FW. The quality of cladode mucilage by treatment did not vary by soil moisture content or among nopal morphotypes. Additionally, there was a positive correlation among the relative water content and the chlorophyll a , b , and total chlorophyll contents with the yield of the nopal cladode mucilage, but not with the ash content or total solids as variables of mucilage quality vs. yield.

Suggested Citation

  • Aurelio Pedroza-Sandoval & Luis Ángel González-Espíndola & Isaac Gramillo-Ávila & José Antonio Miranda-Rojas, 2025. "Certain Physiological and Chemical Indicators Drive the Yield and Quality of Cladode Mucilage in Three Fodder Nopal Morphotypes ( Opuntia spp.) Under Different Soil Water Content Conditions," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:6:p:593-:d:1609770
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/6/593/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/6/593/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:6:p:593-:d:1609770. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.