IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2025i6p572-d1607636.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Toxic Baits as a Strategy for Controlling Invasive Wild Pigs: Acceptability Among Crop Producers

Author

Listed:
  • Molly Selleck

    (National Wildlife Research Center, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, United States Department of Agriculture, 4101 LaPorte Avenue, Fort Collins, CO 80521, USA
    Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Colorado State University, 301 University Ave., Fort Collins, CO 80521, USA)

  • Levi Altringer

    (National Wildlife Research Center, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, United States Department of Agriculture, 4101 LaPorte Avenue, Fort Collins, CO 80521, USA)

  • Sophie C. Mckee

    (National Wildlife Research Center, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, United States Department of Agriculture, 4101 LaPorte Avenue, Fort Collins, CO 80521, USA
    Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Colorado State University, 301 University Ave., Fort Collins, CO 80521, USA)

  • Stephanie Shwiff

    (National Wildlife Research Center, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, United States Department of Agriculture, 4101 LaPorte Avenue, Fort Collins, CO 80521, USA)

  • Keith Carlisle

    (National Wildlife Research Center, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, United States Department of Agriculture, 4101 LaPorte Avenue, Fort Collins, CO 80521, USA)

Abstract

Wild pigs ( Sus scrofa ) have become a pervasive issue in the United States, causing significant damage to agricultural lands and ecosystems. Toxic baits have been developed as a potential management tool. This study evaluates the acceptability of toxic bait usage among U.S. crop producers and explores influential factors of respondent attitudes. Using data from a survey of crop producers in 11 states, we found that 59.6% of respondents somewhat or completely agreed that the use of a toxic bait in their state was acceptable, and 71.4% of respondents somewhat or completely agreed that they would be comfortable using toxic baits if they were experiencing a problem with wild pigs. Regression model results revealed that larger operations and producers of vulnerable crops were more likely to find use acceptable. Producers who generated income from wild pig hunting on their land tended to be less accepting, while those who generated income from the hunting of other species on their land tended to be more accepting. These findings suggest that the acceptability of a toxic bait is shaped by various economic, operational, and demographic factors but that there would likely be demand among producers of high-value crops facing a wild pig problem.

Suggested Citation

  • Molly Selleck & Levi Altringer & Sophie C. Mckee & Stephanie Shwiff & Keith Carlisle, 2025. "Toxic Baits as a Strategy for Controlling Invasive Wild Pigs: Acceptability Among Crop Producers," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:6:p:572-:d:1607636
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/6/572/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/6/572/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:6:p:572-:d:1607636. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.