IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2025i5p567-d1607099.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Soil Organic Carbon Assessment for Carbon Farming: A Review

Author

Listed:
  • Theodoros Petropoulos

    (farmB Digital Agriculture S.A., Dekatis Evdomis (17th) Noemvriou 79, 55534 Thessaloniki, Greece
    Institute for Bio-Economy and Agri-Technology (IBO), Centre of Research and Technology-Hellas (CERTH), 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece
    Department of Supply Chain Management, International Hellenic University, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Lefteris Benos

    (Institute for Bio-Economy and Agri-Technology (IBO), Centre of Research and Technology-Hellas (CERTH), 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Patrizia Busato

    (Interuniversity Department of Regional and Urban Studies and Planning (DIST), Polytechnic of Turin, Viale Mattioli 39, 10125 Torino, Italy)

  • George Kyriakarakos

    (farmB Digital Agriculture S.A., Dekatis Evdomis (17th) Noemvriou 79, 55534 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Dimitrios Kateris

    (Institute for Bio-Economy and Agri-Technology (IBO), Centre of Research and Technology-Hellas (CERTH), 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Dimitrios Aidonis

    (Department of Supply Chain Management, International Hellenic University, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Dionysis Bochtis

    (farmB Digital Agriculture S.A., Dekatis Evdomis (17th) Noemvriou 79, 55534 Thessaloniki, Greece
    Institute for Bio-Economy and Agri-Technology (IBO), Centre of Research and Technology-Hellas (CERTH), 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece)

Abstract

This review is motivated by the urgent need to improve soil organic carbon (SOC) assessment methods, which are vital for enhancing soil health, addressing climate change, and promoting carbon farming. By employing a structured approach that involves a systematic literature search, data extraction, and analysis, 86 relevant studies were identified. These studies were evaluated to address the following specific research questions: (a) What are the state-of-the-art approaches in sampling, modeling, and data acquisition? and (b) What are the key challenges, open issues, potential advancements, and future directions needed to enhance the effectiveness of carbon farming practices? The findings indicate that while traditional SOC assessment techniques remain foundational, there is a significant shift towards incorporating model-based methods, machine learning models, proximal spectroscopy, and remote sensing technologies. These emerging approaches primarily serve as complementary to laboratory analyses, enhancing the overall accuracy and reliability of SOC assessments. Despite these advancements, challenges such as soil spatial and temporal variability, high financial costs, and limitations in measurement accuracy continue to hinder progress. This review also highlights the necessity for scalable, cost-effective, and precise SOC measurement tools, alongside supportive policies and incentives that encourage farmer adoption. Finally, the development of a “System-of-Systems” approach that integrates sampling, sensing, and modeling offers a promising pathway to balancing cost and accuracy, ultimately supporting carbon farming practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Theodoros Petropoulos & Lefteris Benos & Patrizia Busato & George Kyriakarakos & Dimitrios Kateris & Dimitrios Aidonis & Dionysis Bochtis, 2025. "Soil Organic Carbon Assessment for Carbon Farming: A Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-33, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:5:p:567-:d:1607099
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/5/567/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/5/567/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:5:p:567-:d:1607099. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.