IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2025i4p377-d1588752.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Machine Learning in Sustainable Agriculture: Systematic Review and Research Perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Juan Botero-Valencia

    (Grupo Sistemas de Control y Robótica, Faculty of Engineering, Instituto Tecnológico Metropolitano—ITM, Medellin 050034, Colombia
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Vanessa García-Pineda

    (Grupo Sistemas de Control y Robótica, Faculty of Engineering, Instituto Tecnológico Metropolitano—ITM, Medellin 050034, Colombia
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Alejandro Valencia-Arias

    (Vicerrectoría de Investigación e Innovación, Universidad Arturo Prat, Santiago 1110939, Chile
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Jackeline Valencia

    (Instituto de Investigación de Estudios de la Mujer, Universidad Ricardo Palma, Lima 15039, Peru)

  • Erick Reyes-Vera

    (Grupo Sistemas de Control y Robótica, Faculty of Engineering, Instituto Tecnológico Metropolitano—ITM, Medellin 050034, Colombia)

  • Mateo Mejia-Herrera

    (Grupo Sistemas de Control y Robótica, Faculty of Engineering, Instituto Tecnológico Metropolitano—ITM, Medellin 050034, Colombia)

  • Ruber Hernández-García

    (Laboratory of Technological Research in Pattern Recognition–LITRP, Facultad de Ciencias de la Ingeniería, Universidad Católica del Maule, Talca 3480112, Chile
    Department of Computing and Industries, Facultad de Ciencias de la Ingeniería, Universidad Católica del Maule, Talca 3480112, Chile)

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) has revolutionized resource management in agriculture by analyzing vast amounts of data and creating precise predictive models. Precision agriculture improves agricultural productivity and profitability while reducing costs and environmental impact. However, ML implementation faces challenges such as managing large volumes of data and adequate infrastructure. Despite significant advances in ML applications in sustainable agriculture, there is still a lack of deep and systematic understanding in several areas. Challenges include integrating data sources and adapting models to local conditions. This research aims to identify research trends and key players associated with ML use in sustainable agriculture. A systematic review was conducted using the PRISMA methodology by a bibliometric analysis to capture relevant studies from the Scopus and Web of Science databases. The study analyzed the ML literature in sustainable agriculture between 2007 and 2025, identifying 124 articles that meet the criteria for certainty assessment. The findings show a quadratic polynomial growth in the publication of articles on ML in sustainable agriculture, with a notable increase of up to 91% per year. The most productive years were 2024, 2022, and 2023, demonstrating a growing interest in the field. The study highlights the importance of integrating data from multiple sources for improved decision making, soil health monitoring, and understanding the interaction between climate, topography, and soil properties with agricultural land use and crop patterns. Furthermore, ML in sustainable agriculture has evolved from understanding weather data to integrating advanced technologies like the Internet of Things, remote sensing, and smart farming. Finally, the research agenda highlights the need for the deepening and expansion of predominant concepts, such as deep learning and smart farming, to develop more detailed and specialized studies and explore new applications to maximize the benefits of ML in agricultural sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Juan Botero-Valencia & Vanessa García-Pineda & Alejandro Valencia-Arias & Jackeline Valencia & Erick Reyes-Vera & Mateo Mejia-Herrera & Ruber Hernández-García, 2025. "Machine Learning in Sustainable Agriculture: Systematic Review and Research Perspectives," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-37, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:4:p:377-:d:1588752
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/4/377/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/4/377/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maryam Abbasi & Paulo Váz & José Silva & Pedro Martins, 2025. "Machine Learning Approaches for Predicting Maize Biomass Yield: Leveraging Feature Engineering and Comprehensive Data Integration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-15, January.
    2. Khadijeh Alibabaei & Pedro D. Gaspar & Tânia M. Lima, 2021. "Crop Yield Estimation Using Deep Learning Based on Climate Big Data and Irrigation Scheduling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-21, May.
    3. Nees Jan Eck & Ludo Waltman, 2010. "Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 84(2), pages 523-538, August.
    4. Dania Tamayo-Vera & Xiuquan Wang & Morteza Mesbah, 2024. "A Review of Machine Learning Techniques in Agroclimatic Studies," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-19, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aylin Erdoğdu & Faruk Dayi & Ferah Yildiz & Ahmet Yanik & Farshad Ganji, 2025. "Combining Fuzzy Logic and Genetic Algorithms to Optimize Cost, Time and Quality in Modern Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-41, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lutz Bornmann & Robin Haunschild & Sven E. Hug, 2018. "Visualizing the context of citations referencing papers published by Eugene Garfield: a new type of keyword co-occurrence analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 114(2), pages 427-437, February.
    2. Akinpelu, O.A. & Olaleye, O. & Fagbola, O., 2023. "The Soil Organic Matter Decomposers: A Bibliometric Analysis," International Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Research, Malwa International Journals Publication, vol. 9(4), August.
    3. Muhammad Farooq Islam & Ozge Can, 2024. "Integrating digital and sustainable entrepreneurship through business models: a bibliometric analysis," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Gaviria-Marin, Magaly & Merigó, José M. & Baier-Fuentes, Hugo, 2019. "Knowledge management: A global examination based on bibliometric analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 194-220.
    5. J. Gómez-Verjan & I. Gonzalez-Sanchez & E. Estrella-Parra & R. Reyes-Chilpa, 2015. "Trends in the chemical and pharmacological research on the tropical trees Calophyllum brasiliense and Calophyllum inophyllum, a global context," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(2), pages 1019-1030, November.
    6. Luis Araya-Castillo & Felipe Hernández-Perlines & Hugo Moraga & Antonio Ariza-Montes, 2021. "Scientometric Analysis of Research on Socioemotional Wealth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-26, March.
    7. Loet Leydesdorff & Dieter Franz Kogler & Bowen Yan, 2017. "Mapping patent classifications: portfolio and statistical analysis, and the comparison of strengths and weaknesses," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 112(3), pages 1573-1591, September.
    8. Filippo Corsini & Rafael Laurenti & Franziska Meinherz & Francesco Paolo Appio & Luca Mora, 2019. "The Advent of Practice Theories in Research on Sustainable Consumption: Past, Current and Future Directions of the Field," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, January.
    9. Tuba Bircan & Almila Alkim Akdag Salah, 2022. "A Bibliometric Analysis of the Use of Artificial Intelligence Technologies for Social Sciences," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(23), pages 1-17, November.
    10. Kumari, Rajni & Kumar, Manish & Vivekanand, V. & Pareek, Nidhi, 2023. "Chitin biorefinery: A narrative and prophecy of crustacean shell waste sustainable transformation into bioactives and renewable energy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    11. Luis Puente-Díaz & Doina Solís & Siu-heng Wong-Toro, 2024. "Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis on High Hydrostatic Pressure as New Sustainable Technology for Food Processing: Key Concepts and Research Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-18, December.
    12. Fatih Albayrak & Oğuz Poyrazoğlu, 2024. "A Systematic Literature Review on Lean, Industry 4.0, and Digital Factory," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 13486-13508, September.
    13. Migliavacca, Milena & Goodell, John W. & Paltrinieri, Andrea, 2023. "A bibliometric review of portfolio diversification literature," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    14. Zhengyao Liu & Jing Huang & Yonghong Li & Xiaokang Liu & Fei Qiang & Yiping He, 2025. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Geological Hazards Monitoring Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-15, January.
    15. Dilvin Cebi & Melih Soner Celiktas & Hasan Sarptas, 2022. "A Review on Sewage Sludge Valorization via Hydrothermal Carbonization and Applications for Circular Economy," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 2(4), pages 1345-1367, December.
    16. Muthukumar Perumal & Selvam Sekar & Paula C. S. Carvalho, 2024. "Global Investigations of Seawater Intrusion (SWI) in Coastal Groundwaters in the Last Two Decades (2000–2020): A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-28, February.
    17. Massimiliano M. Pellegrini & Riccardo Rialti & Giacomo Marzi & Andrea Caputo, 2020. "Sport entrepreneurship: A synthesis of existing literature and future perspectives," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 795-826, September.
    18. David Vérez & Luisa F. Cabeza, 2021. "Which Building Services Are Considered to Have Impact on Climate Change?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-16, June.
    19. María Pinto & Rosaura Fernández-Pascual & David Caballero-Mariscal & Dora Sales, 2020. "Information literacy trends in higher education (2006–2019): visualizing the emerging field of mobile information literacy," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(2), pages 1479-1510, August.
    20. Francesco Ciampi & Alessandro Giannozzi & Giacomo Marzi & Edward I. Altman, 2021. "Rethinking SME default prediction: a systematic literature review and future perspectives," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(3), pages 2141-2188, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:4:p:377-:d:1588752. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.