Author
Listed:
- Zekai Lv
(College of Information and Management Science, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450046, China)
- Shangbin Yang
(College of Information and Management Science, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450046, China)
- Shichuang Ma
(College of Information and Management Science, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450046, China)
- Qiang Wang
(College of Information and Management Science, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450046, China)
- Jinti Sun
(College of Information and Management Science, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450046, China)
- Linlin Du
(College of Information and Management Science, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450046, China)
- Jiaqi Han
(College of Information and Management Science, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450046, China)
- Yufeng Guo
(College of Information and Management Science, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450046, China)
- Hui Zhang
(College of Information and Management Science, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450046, China)
Abstract
The intelligent transformation of crop leaf disease detection has driven the use of deep neural network algorithms to develop more accurate disease detection models. In resource-constrained environments, the deployment of crop leaf disease detection models on the cloud introduces challenges such as communication latency and privacy concerns. Edge AI devices offer lower communication latency and enhanced scalability. To achieve the efficient deployment of crop leaf disease detection models on edge AI devices, a dataset of 700 images depicting peanut leaf spot, scorch spot, and rust diseases was collected. The YOLOX-Tiny network was utilized to conduct deployment experiments with the peanut leaf disease detection model on the Jetson Nano B01. The experiments initially focused on three aspects of efficient deployment optimization: the fusion of rectified linear unit (ReLU) and convolution operations, the integration of Efficient Non-Maximum Suppression for TensorRT (EfficientNMS_TRT) to accelerate post-processing within the TensorRT model, and the conversion of model formats from number of samples, channels, height, width (NCHW) to number of samples, height, width, and channels (NHWC) in the TensorFlow Lite model. Additionally, experiments were conducted to compare the memory usage, power consumption, and inference latency between the two inference frameworks, as well as to evaluate the real-time video detection performance using DeepStream. The results demonstrate that the fusion of ReLU activation functions with convolution operations reduced the inference latency by 55.5% compared to the use of the Sigmoid linear unit (SiLU) activation alone. In the TensorRT model, the integration of the EfficientNMS_TRT module accelerated post-processing, leading to a reduction in the inference latency of 19.6% and an increase in the frames per second (FPS) of 20.4%. In the TensorFlow Lite model, conversion to the NHWC format decreased the model conversion time by 88.7% and reduced the inference latency by 32.3%. These three efficient deployment optimization methods effectively decreased the inference latency and enhanced the inference efficiency. Moreover, a comparison between the two frameworks revealed that TensorFlow Lite exhibited memory usage reductions of 15% to 20% and power consumption decreases of 15% to 25% compared to TensorRT. Additionally, TensorRT achieved inference latency reductions of 53.2% to 55.2% relative to TensorFlow Lite. Consequently, TensorRT is deemed suitable for tasks requiring strong real-time performance and low latency, whereas TensorFlow Lite is more appropriate for scenarios with constrained memory and power resources. Additionally, the integration of DeepStream and EfficientNMS_TRT was found to optimize memory and power utilization, thereby enhancing the speed of real-time video detection. A detection rate of 28.7 FPS was achieved at a resolution of 1280 × 720. These experiments validate the feasibility and advantages of deploying crop leaf disease detection models on edge AI devices.
Suggested Citation
Zekai Lv & Shangbin Yang & Shichuang Ma & Qiang Wang & Jinti Sun & Linlin Du & Jiaqi Han & Yufeng Guo & Hui Zhang, 2025.
"Efficient Deployment of Peanut Leaf Disease Detection Models on Edge AI Devices,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, February.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:332-:d:1582510
Download full text from publisher
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
- Lina Zhang & Ziyi Huang & Zhiyin Yang & Bo Yang & Shengpeng Yu & Shuai Zhao & Xingrui Zhang & Xinying Li & Han Yang & Yixing Lin & Helong Yu, 2025.
"Tomato Stem and Leaf Segmentation and Phenotype Parameter Extraction Based on Improved Red Billed Blue Magpie Optimization Algorithm,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-15, January.
- Kang Xu & Yan Hou & Wenbin Sun & Dongquan Chen & Danyang Lv & Jiejie Xing & Ranbing Yang, 2025.
"A Detection Method for Sweet Potato Leaf Spot Disease and Leaf-Eating Pests,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-23, February.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:332-:d:1582510. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.