IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2025i3p275-d1578554.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis and Evaluation of Harvest Quality Effectiveness of Carrot Clamping and Conveying Device

Author

Listed:
  • Bokai Wang

    (Nanjing Institute of Agricultural Mechanization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Nanjing 210014, China
    Key Laboratory of Modern Agricultural Equipment, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Nanjing 210014, China)

  • Zhichao Hu

    (Nanjing Institute of Agricultural Mechanization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Nanjing 210014, China
    Key Laboratory of Modern Agricultural Equipment, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Nanjing 210014, China)

  • Feng Wu

    (Nanjing Institute of Agricultural Mechanization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Nanjing 210014, China
    Key Laboratory of Modern Agricultural Equipment, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Nanjing 210014, China)

  • Fengwei Gu

    (Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China)

Abstract

China’s carrot planting area and total output rank first in the world, but China’s mechanized carrot harvesting level is relatively backward. There are many problems in the existing machine operation process, among which the problems of a high leakage rate and high damage rate are the main difficulties faced. In order to study this problem, a test platform composed of clamping and pulling devices and conveying devices is designed, and it can complete the experiments of clamping, pulling and conveying carrot plants and collecting carrot stalks at one time. During the test, the clamping speed was divided into four test levels: 0.40 m/s (T1), 0.85 m/s (T2), 1.30 m/s (T3), and control test (CK), and each test level was carried out three times at different forward speeds. Finally, the leakage rate and damage rate were statistically analyzed. The results show that the average damage rate of Xiahong2 is 6.13%, 3.53%, and 9.36% and that of Sanhong is 6.22%, 3.76%, and 9.88% under the clamping and conveying speeds of T1, T2, and T3 in two years. The average carrot missed-pulling rate of two consecutive years corresponding to two carrot varieties, Xiaohong2 and Sanhong, was 3.68% and 4.14%, respectively. The carrot missed-pulling rate of CK in the control group of two carrot varieties, Xiaohong2 and Sanhong, was high and stable at 96.2% to 97.5%. At the same time, T1, T2, and T3 had similar overall trends of high carrot leakage rates for two carrot varieties at different clamping and conveying speeds. This control experiment also proves that the experimental arrangement is scientific and accurate. The average carrot leakage rate of T1, T2, and T3 for Xiahong2 is 3.91%, 3.42%, and 6.22%, and that of T1, T2, and T3 for Sanhong is 4.06%. The research results can provide a theoretical basis and reference for the optimization and improvement of carrot clamping and conveying devices, and this research can provide a reference for how to reduce the harvest loss of carrot combine harvesters in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Bokai Wang & Zhichao Hu & Feng Wu & Fengwei Gu, 2025. "Analysis and Evaluation of Harvest Quality Effectiveness of Carrot Clamping and Conveying Device," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-15, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:275-:d:1578554
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/3/275/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/3/275/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:275-:d:1578554. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.