IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2025i3p256-d1576516.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Honey as a Rooting Adjuvant for Cutting Propagation of Three Common Nursery Crops

Author

Listed:
  • Anthony T. Bowden

    (Department of Horticulture, University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture, Little Rock, AR 72204, USA)

  • Patricia R. Knight

    (Coastal Research and Extension Center, Mississippi State University, Poplarville, MS 39470, USA)

  • Jenny B. Ryals

    (Coastal Research and Extension Center, Mississippi State University, Poplarville, MS 39470, USA)

  • Christine E. H. Coker

    (Coastal Research and Extension Center, Mississippi State University, Poplarville, MS 39470, USA)

  • Scott A. Langlois

    (Coastal Research and Extension Center, Mississippi State University, Poplarville, MS 39470, USA)

  • Shaun R. Broderick

    (Truck Crops Experiment Station, Mississippi State University, Crystal Springs, MS 39059, USA)

  • Eugene K. Blythe

    (Department of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California–Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521, USA)

  • Hamidou F. Sakhanokho

    (United States Department of Agriculture—Agricultural Research Service, Thad Cochran Southern Horticultural Lab, Poplarville, MS 39470, USA)

Abstract

Plant propagation is a labor-intensive process in the nursery and greenhouse industry, with labor accounting for 41.4% of expenditures in 2019—$4.8 billion of the $11.6 billion total. Labor availability remains a critical issue, and current methods of applying root-promoting compounds to cuttings often yield inconsistent rooting responses. This research investigated honey as a rooting adjuvant and its effects on rooting in Red Cascade™ miniature rose (Rosa ‘MOORcap’), common camellia ( Camellia japonica ), and southern magnolia ( Magnolia grandiflora ‘Little Gem’). For Red Cascade™ rose, adding honey to water-soluble indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) solutions did not improve root counts compared to IBA alone. However, 1000 µL∙L⁻ 1 IBA produced more roots than 250 µL∙L⁻ 1 IBA. Camellia and magnolia cuttings were treated with multiflora, Manuka, or commercial honey, alongside IBA rates of 0 to 4500 µL∙L⁻ 1 . In camellia, honey type or auxin rate did not significantly affect rooting, but local and multiflora honey combined with higher IBA rates increased root counts. For magnolia, multiflora honey improved both root number and quality, outperforming other treatments. While honey showed limited benefits for camellia and rose, multiflora honey demonstrated potential economic advantages for magnolia propagation, enhancing root quality and quantity for producers.

Suggested Citation

  • Anthony T. Bowden & Patricia R. Knight & Jenny B. Ryals & Christine E. H. Coker & Scott A. Langlois & Shaun R. Broderick & Eugene K. Blythe & Hamidou F. Sakhanokho, 2025. "Evaluation of Honey as a Rooting Adjuvant for Cutting Propagation of Three Common Nursery Crops," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-12, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:256-:d:1576516
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/3/256/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/3/256/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:256-:d:1576516. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.