IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v14y2024i9p1489-d1469129.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Design and Experiment of Double-Nest Eye-Type Hole-Wheel Dense-Planting Wheat Dibbler

Author

Listed:
  • Xuanhe Fu

    (College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832000, China)

  • Limin Yan

    (College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832000, China)

  • Long Wang

    (College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Tarim University, Aral 843300, China)

  • Deli Jiang

    (College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832000, China)

  • Xinliang Tian

    (College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832000, China)

  • Tao Wu

    (College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832000, China)

  • Jinhao Zhang

    (College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832000, China)

Abstract

To address the problems of the inaccurate seeding rate and uneven seeding in the process of dense planting of winter wheat in Xinjiang, according to the physical characteristics of the wheat seeds and the agronomic requirements of the high-yield cultivation techniques for the winter wheat “well” type, a double-hole wheel-type densely planted wheat hole sower was designed and produced. Through theoretical design and research, the structural design of the overall hole seeder and its key components was completed. The findings indicated that 5–7 wheat seeds could be planted in each hole at a 9.2 mm nest depth and 610 mm 3 nest volume, which was consistent with the “well”-type high-yield dense-planting cultivation technology’s need for 400,000–500,000 basic seedlings per mu. The rotation speed and the quantity of the wave guide teeth were used as test factors and the qualifying index, replay index, and missed sowing index were used as test indicators to create the two-factor, three-level central composite design center combination test. It was possible to derive the mathematical model connecting the test factors and test indexes. The regression model underwent multi-objective optimization using the Design-Expert 13 program to determine the optimal parameters: the qualifying index was 91.24%, the replay index was 6.14%, and the missed seeding index was 2.62% when the wave guide rail had four teeth and the seed drill rotated at a speed of 40 revolutions per minute. The best parameter combinations were used for a bench verification test, and the test indicated that the qualified index was 90.25%, the replay index was 4.59%, and the missed broadcast index was 5.16%. The results demonstrated that the densely planted wheat hole seeder performs well, satisfies the requirements for winter wheat dense-planting and sowing operations, and serves as a model for the densely planted wheat hole seeders that will be optimized in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Xuanhe Fu & Limin Yan & Long Wang & Deli Jiang & Xinliang Tian & Tao Wu & Jinhao Zhang, 2024. "Design and Experiment of Double-Nest Eye-Type Hole-Wheel Dense-Planting Wheat Dibbler," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-25, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:9:p:1489-:d:1469129
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/9/1489/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/9/1489/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:9:p:1489-:d:1469129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.