Author
Listed:
- Bingquan Tian
(School of Agricultural Engineering and Food Science, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255000, China
Shandong-Binzhou Cotton Technology Backyard, Binzhou 256600, China)
- Hailin Yu
(School of Agricultural Engineering and Food Science, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255000, China
Shandong-Binzhou Cotton Technology Backyard, Binzhou 256600, China)
- Shuailing Zhang
(School of Agricultural Engineering and Food Science, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255000, China
Shandong-Binzhou Cotton Technology Backyard, Binzhou 256600, China)
- Xiaoli Wang
(School of Agricultural Engineering and Food Science, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255000, China
Shandong-Binzhou Cotton Technology Backyard, Binzhou 256600, China)
- Lei Yang
(School of Agricultural Engineering and Food Science, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255000, China
Shandong-Binzhou Cotton Technology Backyard, Binzhou 256600, China)
- Jingqian Li
(School of Agricultural Engineering and Food Science, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255000, China
Shandong-Binzhou Cotton Technology Backyard, Binzhou 256600, China)
- Wenhao Cui
(School of Agricultural Engineering and Food Science, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255000, China
Shandong-Binzhou Cotton Technology Backyard, Binzhou 256600, China)
- Zesheng Wang
(Shandong-Binzhou Cotton Technology Backyard, Binzhou 256600, China
Nongxi Cotton Cooperative, Binzhou 256600, China)
- Liqun Lu
(Shandong-Binzhou Cotton Technology Backyard, Binzhou 256600, China
School of Transportation and Vehicle Engineering, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255000, China)
- Yubin Lan
(School of Agricultural Engineering and Food Science, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255000, China)
- Jing Zhao
(School of Agricultural Engineering and Food Science, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255000, China
Shandong-Binzhou Cotton Technology Backyard, Binzhou 256600, China)
Abstract
In order to improve the accuracy of multispectral image inversion of soil and plant analytical development (SPAD) of the cotton canopy, image segmentation methods were utilized to remove the background interference, such as soil and shadow in UAV multispectral images. UAV multispectral images of cotton bud stage canopies at three different heights (30 m, 50 m, and 80 m) were acquired. Four methods, namely vegetation index thresholding (VIT), supervised classification by support vector machine (SVM), spectral mixture analysis (SMA), and multiple endmember spectral mixture analysis (MESMA), were used to segment cotton, soil, and shadows in the multispectral images of cotton. The segmented UAV multispectral images were used to extract the spectral information of the cotton canopy, and eight vegetation indices were calculated to construct the dataset. Partial least squares regression (PLSR), Random forest (FR), and support vector regression (SVR) algorithms were used to construct the inversion model of cotton SPAD. This study analyzed the effects of different image segmentation methods on the extraction accuracy of spectral information and the accuracy of SPAD modeling in the cotton canopy. The results showed that (1) The accuracy of spectral information extraction can be improved by removing background interference such as soil and shadows using four image segmentation methods. The correlation between the vegetation indices calculated from MESMA segmented images and the SPAD of the cotton canopy was improved the most; (2) At three different flight altitudes, the vegetation indices calculated by the MESMA segmentation method were used as the input variable, and the SVR model had the best accuracy in the inversion of cotton SPAD, with R 2 of 0.810, 0.778, and 0.697, respectively; (3) At a flight altitude of 80 m, the R 2 of the SVR models constructed using vegetation indices calculated from images segmented by VIT, SVM, SMA, and MESMA methods were improved by 2.2%, 5.8%, 13.7%, and 17.9%, respectively, compared to the original images. Therefore, the MESMA mixed pixel decomposition method can effectively remove soil and shadows in multispectral images, especially to provide a reference for improving the inversion accuracy of crop physiological parameters in low-resolution images with more mixed pixels.
Suggested Citation
Bingquan Tian & Hailin Yu & Shuailing Zhang & Xiaoli Wang & Lei Yang & Jingqian Li & Wenhao Cui & Zesheng Wang & Liqun Lu & Yubin Lan & Jing Zhao, 2024.
"Inversion of Cotton Soil and Plant Analytical Development Based on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Multispectral Imagery and Mixed Pixel Decomposition,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, August.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:9:p:1452-:d:1463812
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:9:p:1452-:d:1463812. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.