IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v14y2024i8p1417-d1460605.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Parameter Optimization and Test for the Pulse-Type Gas Explosion Subsoiler

Author

Listed:
  • Xiangdong Xu

    (College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832000, China)

  • Pengyu Jing

    (College of Mechanical Engineering, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou 310018, China)

  • Quan Yao

    (College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832000, China)

  • Wenhui Chen

    (College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832000, China)

  • Hewei Meng

    (Engineering Research Center for Production Mechanization of Oasis Characteristic Cash Crop, Ministry of Education, Shihezi 832000, China)

  • Xia Li

    (National Demonstration Center for Experimental Mechanical and Electrical Engineering Education, Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjin 300384, China)

  • Jiangtao Qi

    (College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832000, China)

  • Huijie Peng

    (College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832000, China
    Engineering Research Center for Production Mechanization of Oasis Characteristic Cash Crop, Ministry of Education, Shihezi 832000, China)

Abstract

To address the problem of large tractive resistance in traditional subsoiling methods, this paper designed a pulse-type gas explosion subsoiler, as well as an air-blown double-ended chisel type subsoiling shovel and a conduit. The mathematical equation of the influence of the structural parameters of the subsoiler on the groove profile is established. The EDEM 2022 software was used to simulate the subsoiling operation process. The soil disturbance law of the chisel subsoiler was analyzed by the change of soil particle velocity. The optimum value interval of quadratic regression orthogonal rotation combination test factors was determined by using the steepest climb test, with specific tillage resistance and filling power as evaluation indicators. Based on the Box–Behnken design test, a second-order regression model of response value and significance parameter was obtained, and an optimal combination was found by optimizing the significance parameter. The effects of subsoiling air pressure, pulse width and pulse interval on evaluation indicators were analyzed by the response surface method; the test results show that when the air pressure was 0.8 MPa, the pulse width was 0.17 s and the pulse interval was 0.12 s, and the specific tillage resistance was 0.4421 N/mm 2 and the filling power was 18.5%; a comparative test between the pulse-type gas explosion subsoiler and a continuous gas explosion subsoiler was carried out, and the specific tillage resistance was reduced by 12.2% and the filling power was reduced by 10.5%; the comparative test shows that the pulse-type gas explosion subsoiler has smaller tractive resistance per unit area and smaller disturbance to soil. The research results provide a theoretical basis and reference for the optimization and improvement of gas explosion subsoilers.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiangdong Xu & Pengyu Jing & Quan Yao & Wenhui Chen & Hewei Meng & Xia Li & Jiangtao Qi & Huijie Peng, 2024. "Parameter Optimization and Test for the Pulse-Type Gas Explosion Subsoiler," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-18, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:8:p:1417-:d:1460605
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/8/1417/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/8/1417/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lei Zhang & Xiaowei Wang & Jianneng Chen & Haiyang Wang & Yonggan Cao, 2024. "Analysis and Optimization of Low-Resistance Animal Bionic Subsoiling Shovel Based on EDEM," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-21, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:8:p:1417-:d:1460605. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.