IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v14y2024i8p1355-d1455692.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploiting the Yield Potential of Spring Barley in Poland: The Roles of Crop Rotation, Cultivar, and Plant Protection

Author

Listed:
  • Marta K. Kostrzewska

    (Department of Agroecosystems and Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Plac Łódzki 3, 10-718 Olsztyn, Poland)

  • Magdalena Jastrzębska

    (Department of Agroecosystems and Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Plac Łódzki 3, 10-718 Olsztyn, Poland)

Abstract

The need to better exploit crop yield potential through agronomic practices is driven by the necessity to feed a growing population in a changing climate. In this regard, cereals, including barley, represent strategic crops. Barley grain yield in Poland is comparable to the European average. Under good habitat and agronomic conditions, it can exceed the average. The effects of cropping system (continuous cropping, CC; crop rotation, CR), cultivar (Radek, Skald), plant protection level (control treatment, CT; herbicide, H; herbicide and fungicide, HF), and the interactions among these factors on spring barley yield were evaluated in northeast Poland in 2017–2022. Growing spring barley in the CR system promoted higher yields compared to the CC system due to increased spike density and 1000-grain weight (TGW). Skald, with a higher TGW, yielded more than Radek. H treatment increased barley yield by improving the spike density and TGW, while fungicide inclusion (HF) contributed to further yield increase by improving the TGW. The interaction of CR and HF practices contributed to the greatest realization of the yield potential of both cultivars. The study confirmed the strong contribution of inter-annual weather variability in modifying the effects of cropping system, cultivar, and plant protection strategy on barley yield.

Suggested Citation

  • Marta K. Kostrzewska & Magdalena Jastrzębska, 2024. "Exploiting the Yield Potential of Spring Barley in Poland: The Roles of Crop Rotation, Cultivar, and Plant Protection," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-19, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:8:p:1355-:d:1455692
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/8/1355/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/8/1355/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matthias Schumacher & Simon Ohnmacht & Ronja Rosenstein & Roland Gerhards, 2018. "How Management Factors Influence Weed Communities of Cereals, Their Diversity and Endangered Weed Species in Central Europe," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-13, November.
    2. Elzbieta Czembor & Zygmunt Kaczmarek & Wiesław Pilarczyk & Dariusz Mańkowski & Jerzy H. Czembor, 2022. "Simulating Spring Barley Yield under Moderate Input Management System in Poland," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-20, July.
    3. Madara Darguza & Zinta Gaile, 2023. "The Productivity of Crop Rotation Depending on the Included Plants and Soil Tillage," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, September.
    4. Elaine Wheaton & Suren Kulshreshtha, 2017. "Environmental Sustainability of Agriculture Stressed by Changing Extremes of Drought and Excess Moisture: A Conceptual Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-14, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marius Mihai Micu & Toma Adrian Dinu & Gina Fintineru & Valentina Constanta Tudor & Elena Stoian & Eduard Alexandru Dumitru & Paula Stoicea & Adina Iorga, 2022. "Climate Change—Between “Myth and Truth” in Romanian Farmers’ Perception," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-21, July.
    2. Luděk Tyšer & Michaela Kolářová & Ondřej Tulačka & Pavel Hamouz, 2021. "Weed vegetation in conventional and organic farming in West Bohemia (Czech Republic)," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 67(7), pages 376-382.
    3. Rafał Górski & Anna Płaza, 2024. "The Effects of Intercropping Narrowleaf Lupine with Cereals under Variable Mineral Nitrogen Fertilization," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-20, June.
    4. Orduño Torres, Miguel Angel & Kallas, Zein & Ornelas Herrera, Selene Ivette, 2020. "Farmers’ environmental perceptions and preferences regarding climate change adaptation and mitigation actions; towards a sustainable agricultural system in México," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    5. Sang Ug Kim & Minwoo Son & Eun-Sung Chung & Xiao Yu, 2018. "Effects of Non-Stationarity on Flood Frequency Analysis: Case Study of the Cheongmicheon Watershed in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-16, April.
    6. Adam Kleofas Berbeć & Mariola Staniak & Beata Feledyn-Szewczyk & Anna Kocira & Jarosław Stalenga, 2020. "Organic but Also Low-Input Conventional Farming Systems Support High Biodiversity of Weed Species in Winter Cereals," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-16, September.
    7. Ryota Arai & Masashi Kiguchi & Michio Murakami, 2020. "A Quantitative Estimation of the Effects of Measures to Counter Climate Change on Well-Being: Focus on Non-Use of Air Conditioners as a Mitigation Measure in Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-18, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:8:p:1355-:d:1455692. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.