Author
Listed:
- Evangelina Pareja-Sánchez
(Ecology Unit, University Institute of Research in Olive Grove and Olive Oil (INUO), University of Jaén, Campus Universitario de Las Lagunillas s/n, 23071 Jaén, Spain
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Pablo Domouso
(Ecology Unit, University Institute of Research in Olive Grove and Olive Oil (INUO), University of Jaén, Campus Universitario de Las Lagunillas s/n, 23071 Jaén, Spain
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Beatriz Gómez-Muñoz
(Estación Experimental del Zaidín, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (EEZ-CSIC), Profesor Albareda 1, 18008 Granada, Spain)
- María T. Heras-Linares
(Ecology Unit, University Institute of Research in Olive Grove and Olive Oil (INUO), University of Jaén, Campus Universitario de Las Lagunillas s/n, 23071 Jaén, Spain)
- Roberto García-Ruíz
(Ecology Unit, University Institute of Research in Olive Grove and Olive Oil (INUO), University of Jaén, Campus Universitario de Las Lagunillas s/n, 23071 Jaén, Spain)
Abstract
Carbon farming practices are pivotal for enhancing soil organic carbon (SOC) storage in agricultural systems. This study focuses on evaluating the effects of spontaneous cover crops as a conservation strategy compared to conventional management practices on total, non-protected, and protected SOC fractions, as well as carbon saturation, in olive groves across 13 paired sites (26 sites in total) in Andalucía, Spain. The research evaluates organic carbon concentrations in different soil fractions: non-protected (250–2000 µm), physically protected (53–250 µm), and chemically protected (<53 µm). The results reveal that olive groves managed with temporary spontaneous cover crops (CC) over the last 8–12 years generally exhibit higher SOC concentrations compared to those managed conventionally (BS), with significant differences observed across multiple sites. CC sites exhibited higher carbon stocks, with protected carbon averaging 42.6 Mg C ha −1 compared to 29.7 Mg C ha −1 in BS, and non-protected carbon at 10.3 Mg C ha −1 versus 4.8 Mg C ha −1 . A direct relationship was identified between total SOC and both protected and non-protected carbon fractions, indicating that the soil of the studies olive orchards is far from being saturated in protected SOC. Moreover, the soil of the CC olive farms had a lower carbon saturation deficit (45.3%) compared to BS (67.2%). The findings show that maintaining the cover crops in olive orchards significantly contributed to carbon sequestration and reduced carbon saturation deficits by increasing the stocks of protected SOC.
Suggested Citation
Evangelina Pareja-Sánchez & Pablo Domouso & Beatriz Gómez-Muñoz & María T. Heras-Linares & Roberto García-Ruíz, 2024.
"Conservation Practices Boost Soil-Protected Organic Carbon Stocks in Olive Orchards,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-15, August.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:8:p:1354-:d:1455603
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:8:p:1354-:d:1455603. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.