IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v14y2024i8p1346-d1454619.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Review of Perception Technologies for Berry Fruit-Picking Robots: Advantages, Disadvantages, Challenges, and Prospects

Author

Listed:
  • Chenglin Wang

    (Faculty of Modern Agricultural Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650504, China)

  • Weiyu Pan

    (Faculty of Modern Agricultural Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650504, China)

  • Tianlong Zou

    (Foshan-Zhongke Innovation Research Institute of Intelligent Agriculture and Robotics, Guangzhou 528251, China)

  • Chunjiang Li

    (Faculty of Modern Agricultural Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650504, China)

  • Qiyu Han

    (Faculty of Modern Agricultural Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650504, China)

  • Haoming Wang

    (Faculty of Modern Agricultural Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650504, China)

  • Jing Yang

    (Faculty of Modern Agricultural Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650504, China)

  • Xiangjun Zou

    (Foshan-Zhongke Innovation Research Institute of Intelligent Agriculture and Robotics, Guangzhou 528251, China
    College of Intelligent Manufacturing and Modern Industry, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China)

Abstract

Berries are nutritious and valuable, but their thin skin, soft flesh, and fragility make harvesting and picking challenging. Manual and traditional mechanical harvesting methods are commonly used, but they are costly in labor and can damage the fruit. To overcome these challenges, it may be worth exploring alternative harvesting methods. Using berry fruit-picking robots with perception technology is a viable option to improve the efficiency of berry harvesting. This review presents an overview of the mechanisms of berry fruit-picking robots, encompassing their underlying principles, the mechanics of picking and grasping, and an examination of their structural design. The importance of perception technology during the picking process is highlighted. Then, several perception techniques commonly used by berry fruit-picking robots are described, including visual perception, tactile perception, distance measurement, and switching sensors. The methods of these four perceptual techniques used by berry-picking robots are described, and their advantages and disadvantages are analyzed. In addition, the technical characteristics of perception technologies in practical applications are analyzed and summarized, and several advanced applications of berry fruit-picking robots are presented. Finally, the challenges that perception technologies need to overcome and the prospects for overcoming these challenges are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Chenglin Wang & Weiyu Pan & Tianlong Zou & Chunjiang Li & Qiyu Han & Haoming Wang & Jing Yang & Xiangjun Zou, 2024. "A Review of Perception Technologies for Berry Fruit-Picking Robots: Advantages, Disadvantages, Challenges, and Prospects," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-42, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:8:p:1346-:d:1454619
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/8/1346/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/8/1346/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Trevor J. Jones & Etienne Jambon-Puillet & Joel Marthelot & P.-T. Brun, 2021. "Bubble casting soft robotics," Nature, Nature, vol. 599(7884), pages 229-233, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dongliang Fan & Xi Yuan & Wenyu Wu & Renjie Zhu & Xin Yang & Yuxuan Liao & Yunteng Ma & Chufan Xiao & Cheng Chen & Changyue Liu & Hongqiang Wang & Peiwu Qin, 2022. "Self-shrinking soft demoulding for complex high-aspect-ratio microchannels," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Liang Yue & S. Macrae Montgomery & Xiaohao Sun & Luxia Yu & Yuyang Song & Tsuyoshi Nomura & Masato Tanaka & H. Jerry Qi, 2023. "Single-vat single-cure grayscale digital light processing 3D printing of materials with large property difference and high stretchability," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    3. Alejandro Martínez-Calvo & Matthew D. Biviano & Anneline H. Christensen & Eleni Katifori & Kaare H. Jensen & Miguel Ruiz-García, 2024. "The fluidic memristor as a collective phenomenon in elastohydrodynamic networks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
    4. Wenfei Ai & Kai Hou & Jiaxin Wu & Yue Long & Kai Song, 2024. "Miniaturized and untethered McKibben muscles based on photothermal-induced gas-liquid transformation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-8, December.
    5. Jiang Yan & Ying Zhang & Zongguang Liu & Junzhuan Wang & Jun Xu & Linwei Yu, 2023. "Ultracompact single-nanowire-morphed grippers driven by vectorial Lorentz forces for dexterous robotic manipulations," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    6. Man Hu & Feng Wang & Li Chen & Peng Huo & Yuqi Li & Xi Gu & Kai Leong Chong & Daosheng Deng, 2022. "Near-infrared-laser-navigated dancing bubble within water via a thermally conductive interface," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-8, December.
    7. Shibo Zou & Sergio Picella & Jelle Vries & Vera G. Kortman & Aimée Sakes & Johannes T. B. Overvelde, 2024. "A retrofit sensing strategy for soft fluidic robots," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.
    8. Wang, Lixia & Sun, Xiang & Wang, Dongfang & Cui, Pengyuan & Wang, Jian & Li, Qian, 2024. "An integrated, multi-functional intrinsic responsive foldable protective layer for space station solar panels," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    9. Siqi An & Xiaowen Li & Zengrong Guo & Yi Huang & Yanlin Zhang & Hanqing Jiang, 2024. "Energy-efficient dynamic 3D metasurfaces via spatiotemporal jamming interleaved assemblies for tactile interfaces," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    10. Jiefeng Sun & Elisha Lerner & Brandon Tighe & Clint Middlemist & Jianguo Zhao, 2023. "Embedded shape morphing for morphologically adaptive robots," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    11. Jun Kyu Choe & Junsoo Kim & Hyeonseo Song & Joonbum Bae & Jiyun Kim, 2023. "A soft, self-sensing tensile valve for perceptive soft robots," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:8:p:1346-:d:1454619. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.