Author
Listed:
- Francine B. Facco
(Department of Animal Science, Rural Sciences Center, Federal University of Santa Maria, Roraima Avenue 1000, Santa Maria 97.105-900, Brazil)
- Richander G. Heller
(Department of Animal Science, Rural Sciences Center, Federal University of Santa Maria, Roraima Avenue 1000, Santa Maria 97.105-900, Brazil)
- Vitória Santos
(Department of Animal Science, Rural Sciences Center, Federal University of Santa Maria, Roraima Avenue 1000, Santa Maria 97.105-900, Brazil)
- Julio Viégas
(Department of Animal Science, Rural Sciences Center, Federal University of Santa Maria, Roraima Avenue 1000, Santa Maria 97.105-900, Brazil)
- Caio S. Takiya
(Academic Department of Agrarian Sciences, Federal University of Technology—Paraná, Via do Conhecimento, km 1, Pato Branco 85.503-390, Brazil)
- Jefferson R. Gandra
(Faculdade de Agronomia, Instituto de Estudo em Desenvolvimento Agrário e Regional, Universidade Federal do Sul e Sudeste do Para, Marabá 68.507-590, Brazil)
- Tiago A. Del Valle
(Department of Animal Science, Rural Sciences Center, Federal University of Santa Maria, Roraima Avenue 1000, Santa Maria 97.105-900, Brazil)
Abstract
Fiber fragility is defined as the particle size reduction rate during chewing and can help to explain the effects on feed intake and animal performance of different fiber sources. This study aimed to estimate the fiber fragility of corn silage and cool-season pasture based on their chemical composition. Between June and December 2022, 25 samples of corn silage and 25 samples of cool-season pasture were collected from dairy farms in the state of Rio Grande do Sul. The samples were analyzed for particle size distribution, chemical composition, and fiber fragility. Contents of dry matter (DM), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), acid detergent lignin (ADL), and fiber fragility were greater in corn silages compared to cool-season pasture. However, the ADF–NDF ratio was similar in forages. Crude protein (CP) content and the in situ degradation of DM and NDF were greater in cool-season pasture than corn silage. Dry matter and NDF in situ degradation were negatively correlated with increased contents of ADF, NDF, and ADL and the ADF–NDF ratio in forages. Fiber fragility was negatively correlated with DM degradation and positively correlated with contents of ADF, NDF, ADL, and DM. Fiber fragility decreased as CP content increased. Thus, greater fiber fragility may jeopardize nutrient degradation, and levels of fiber fragility are directly associated with fiber content.
Suggested Citation
Francine B. Facco & Richander G. Heller & Vitória Santos & Julio Viégas & Caio S. Takiya & Jefferson R. Gandra & Tiago A. Del Valle, 2024.
"Estimation of Fiber Fragility and Digestibility of Corn Silages and Cool Season Pastures,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-8, August.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:8:p:1345-:d:1454580
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:8:p:1345-:d:1454580. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.