Author
Listed:
- Ronnie Coêlho de Andrade
(College of Agricultural Science, Federal University of Grande Dourados, Dourados 79804-970, MS, Brazil)
- Marco Antonio Previdelli Orrico Junior
(College of Agricultural Science, Federal University of Grande Dourados, Dourados 79804-970, MS, Brazil)
- Yara América da Silva
(College of Agricultural Science, Federal University of Grande Dourados, Dourados 79804-970, MS, Brazil)
- Marciana Retore
(EMBRAPA Agropecuária Oeste, Dourados 79804-970, MS, Brazil)
- Tatiane Fernandes
(School of Animal Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute, State University, Blacksburg, VA 3290, USA)
- Ana Carolina Amorim Orrico
(College of Agricultural Science, Federal University of Grande Dourados, Dourados 79804-970, MS, Brazil)
- Fernando Miranda de Vargas Junior
(College of Agricultural Science, Federal University of Grande Dourados, Dourados 79804-970, MS, Brazil)
- Isabele Paola de Oliveira Amaral
(College of Agricultural Science, Federal University of Grande Dourados, Dourados 79804-970, MS, Brazil)
Abstract
Monensin and essential oils have antimicrobial properties that may impact silage fermentation. The present study was divided into two trials to evaluate the effects of monensin (MON) and essential limonene oils (ELO) as additives in the ensiling of total mixed ration (TMR). In the first assay, TMR was tested with sheep in growth (65% dry matter—DM) using the following treatments: control (no additive), MON35 (35 mg of monensina per kg of DM), MON45 (45 mg of monensina per kg of DM), ELO300 (300 mg of essential limonene oil per kg of DM), and ELO600 (600 mg of essential limonene oil per kg of DM). In the second assay, the same treatments were used in TMR for lactating cows under two moisture conditions (30% and 40% DM). The parameters assessed included fermentative losses, short-chain fatty acid profiles, aerobic stability (hours needed for silage to reach 2 °C above ambient), chemical composition, and in vitro DM digestibility of the silages. Treatment averages were compared using the Scott–Knott test at 5% significance. In the first assay, the treatments with ELO had the lowest ( p < 0.05) pH values and the highest ( p < 0.05) lactic acid concentrations, with treatment ELO600 leading to the highest ( p < 0.05) aerobic stability (297.88 h). Only the starch contents of the ELO treatments were lower ( p < 0.05) than the others. In the second assay, the silages with the highest moisture contents and ELO600 exhibited the lowest ( p < 0.05) values of DM recovery, lactic acid, and pH. The highest ( p < 0.05) lactic acid:acetic acid ratios were observed in the silages with the most moisture added with MON35 and MON45. The use of MON and ELO increased aerobic stability, with the highest ( p < 0.05) values observed for ELO600 and MON35. The treatments with MON and ELO resulted in silages with the lowest ( p < 0.05) fiber contents and highest ether extract and starch contents when compared with control. Thus, MON and essential oils improve fermentative quality but ELO should be used in lower doses in humid silages to avoid negative fermentation impacts.
Suggested Citation
Ronnie Coêlho de Andrade & Marco Antonio Previdelli Orrico Junior & Yara América da Silva & Marciana Retore & Tatiane Fernandes & Ana Carolina Amorim Orrico & Fernando Miranda de Vargas Junior & Isabe, 2024.
"Impact of Monensin Sodium and Essential Limonene Oil on the Fermentation and Chemical Composition of Total Mixed Ration Silages with Moisture Variations,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-16, August.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:8:p:1319-:d:1452786
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:8:p:1319-:d:1452786. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.