Author
Listed:
- Min Liu
(College of Engineering and Technology, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China)
- Xuejie Ma
(College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China)
- Weizhi Feng
(College of Engineering and Technology, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China)
- Haiyang Jing
(College of Engineering and Technology, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China)
- Qian Shi
(College of Engineering and Technology, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China)
- Yang Wang
(College of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China)
- Dongyan Huang
(College of Engineering and Technology, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China)
- Jingli Wang
(College of Engineering and Technology, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China)
Abstract
Paddy field leveling is an essential step before rice transplanting. During the operation of a paddy field grader, a common issue is the wrapping of rice straw around the blades, resulting in a low rice straw burial rate. This study focused on analyzing the operating parameters of a disc spring–tooth-combined paddy field grader. A soil–straw mechanism simulation model was created using EDEM 2021 software to simulate the field operation status. Firstly, the single-factor test was carried out, with the working speed, the working depth of the disc cutter roller, and the rotation speed of the cutter roller as the factors and the straw-buried rate (SBR) and the machine forward resistance (MFR) as the test indexes, and the parameter range was optimized. The parameters were optimized by the response surface method (RSM) and machine learning algorithms. The results indicated that the genetic algorithm–back propagation (GA-BP) neural network outperformed other optimization models in terms of prediction accuracy and stability. By utilizing the GA-BP regression model and RSM model for regression fitting, two sets of optimal parameter combinations were obtained. Verification experiments were carried out using two sets of parameter combinations. Taking the average of the experimental results, the simulation results showed that the straw burial rate was 93.47% and the forward resistance was 6487 N for the parameter combinations of RSM, and the straw burial rate was 94.86% and the forward resistance was 6352 N for the parameter combinations of GA-BP; the field experiments showed that the straw burial rate was 92.86% and the forward resistance was 6518 N for the parameter combinations of RSM, and the straw burial rate was 95.17% and the forward resistance was 6249 N for the parameter combinations of GA-BP. The results demonstrated that the GA-BP prediction model exhibited better predictive capabilities compared to the traditional RSM, providing more accurate predictions of the paddy field grader’s field operation performance.
Suggested Citation
Min Liu & Xuejie Ma & Weizhi Feng & Haiyang Jing & Qian Shi & Yang Wang & Dongyan Huang & Jingli Wang, 2024.
"Optimization of Operation Parameters and Performance Prediction of Paddy Field Grader Based on a GA-BP Neural Network,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-17, August.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:8:p:1283-:d:1449439
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:8:p:1283-:d:1449439. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.