IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v14y2024i8p1231-d1443339.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Response of Yam Yield and Soil Microbial Communities to Soil Fumigation and Substrate Cultivation

Author

Listed:
  • Xi Jin

    (Hebei Technology Innovation Center for Green Management of Soil-Borne Diseases, Baoding University, Baoding 071000, China)

  • Zheng Hao

    (Hebei Technology Innovation Center for Green Management of Soil-Borne Diseases, Baoding University, Baoding 071000, China)

  • Yelong Song

    (Hebei Technology Innovation Center for Green Management of Soil-Borne Diseases, Baoding University, Baoding 071000, China)

  • Lan Gao

    (Hebei Technology Innovation Center for Green Management of Soil-Borne Diseases, Baoding University, Baoding 071000, China)

  • Fuqiang He

    (Hebei Technology Innovation Center for Green Management of Soil-Borne Diseases, Baoding University, Baoding 071000, China)

  • Qingjie Li

    (State Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Arid and Semi-Arid Arable Land in Northern China, The Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Aocheng Cao

    (Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China)

Abstract

Soil fumigation is considered a method to control soil-borne diseases and solve crop continuous cropping obstacles. However, fumigant residues in the soil are detrimental to soil health. Though substrate cultivation is a cultivation mode that can promote plant growth, studies to date on whether substrate cultivation can replace soil fumigation for the control of soil pathogens are limited. In this study, the effects of chloropicrin fumigation (Pic) and substrate cultivation (SC) on yam growth, soil pathogens, soil nutrients, and microbial communities were demonstrated using a 2-year field experiment. The results showed that SC significantly increased the content of soil organic matter (SOM), available phosphorus, and available potassium compared with Pic. In addition, SC could effectively reduce the number of Fusarium spp. and Phytophthora spp., decrease the rate of diseased yam plants, and significantly increase the yam yield. Moreover, SC significantly increased the abundance of beneficial microorganisms such as Actinobacteriota , Acidobacteriota , and Bacillus in soil. Correlation analysis showed that yam yield exhibited a negative relation with the number of soil pathogens and a positive correlation with SOM. Our study suggests that substrate cultivation can be an alternative to soil fumigation to control soil pathogens and protect soil health.

Suggested Citation

  • Xi Jin & Zheng Hao & Yelong Song & Lan Gao & Fuqiang He & Qingjie Li & Aocheng Cao, 2024. "Response of Yam Yield and Soil Microbial Communities to Soil Fumigation and Substrate Cultivation," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-15, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:8:p:1231-:d:1443339
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/8/1231/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/8/1231/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:8:p:1231-:d:1443339. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.