IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v14y2024i8p1213-d1441808.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on the Dynamic Evaluation of the Competitiveness of Listed Seed Enterprises in China

Author

Listed:
  • Lanlan Li

    (Institute of Agricultural Economics and Development, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Lu Zhang

    (China Seed Association, Beijing 100045, China)

  • Xiudong Wang

    (Institute of Agricultural Economics and Development, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China)

Abstract

Seed enterprises are crucial for ensuring national food security, the driving force behind the seed industry’s advancement, and the core entity in constructing a modern seed industry system. At the micro and macro levels, agricultural seed enterprises face challenges and pressures in earning excess profits, enhancing their competitive edge, and resisting the incursion of multinational seed enterprises. This article selects panel data from 49 listed seed enterprises in China from 2015 to 2022 and uses methods such as global principal component analysis (GPCA) and Q-type cluster analysis to measure and evaluate the competitiveness of Chinese seed enterprises. Research has found that: (1) From 2015 to 2022, the overall competitiveness of listed Chinese agricultural seed enterprises has shown an upward trend. The competitiveness of agricultural seed enterprises can be further decomposed into operational capabilities, growth capabilities, production efficiency, technological innovation capabilities, etc. (2) The top ten agricultural seed enterprises in China have obvious advantages in operational and technological innovation capabilities, but their growth capabilities and production efficiency are insufficient. (3) Regarding the vertical comparison of the seed industry, the ranking of the competitiveness of Chinese listed agricultural seed enterprises from strong to weak is wheat seed enterprises > other seed enterprises > melon and vegetable seed enterprises > corn seed enterprises > rice seed enterprises. (4) Compared with international seed industry giants, there are various reasons why China’s top agricultural seed enterprises have weaker competitiveness, specifically reflected in research and development investment, scale and market share, industrial layout, and other aspects. The findings of this research offer empirical evidence to bolster the competitiveness of seed enterprises and advance the seed industry, while also aiding in fortifying the nation’s strategic oversight of the seed sector, bearing profound implications for safeguarding food security.

Suggested Citation

  • Lanlan Li & Lu Zhang & Xiudong Wang, 2024. "Research on the Dynamic Evaluation of the Competitiveness of Listed Seed Enterprises in China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-24, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:8:p:1213-:d:1441808
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/8/1213/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/8/1213/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ali Saleh Alarussi & Sami Mohammed Alhaderi, 2018. "Factors affecting profitability in Malaysia," Journal of Economic Studies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 45(3), pages 442-458, August.
    2. Li, Guangpei & Wang, Xiaoyu & Su, Shibin & Su, Yuan, 2019. "How green technological innovation ability influences enterprise competitiveness," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    3. Xin-Bing Kong & Jin-Guan Lin & Cheng Liu & Guang-Ying Liu, 2023. "Discrepancy Between Global and Local Principal Component Analysis on Large-Panel High-Frequency Data," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 118(542), pages 1333-1344, April.
    4. Agus Dwi Nugroho & Zoltan Lakner, 2022. "Impact of economic globalisation on agriculture in developing countries: A review," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 68(5), pages 180-188.
    5. George Emm. Halkos & Nickolaos G. Tzeremes, 2007. "International Competitiveness in the ICT Industry: Evaluating the Performance of the Top 50 Companies," Global Economic Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(2), pages 167-182.
    6. Li, Baibing & Martin, Elaine B. & Morris, A. Julian, 2002. "On principal component analysis in L1," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 471-474, September.
    7. Nikhil Varaiya & Roger A. Kerin & David Weeks, 1987. "The relationship between growth, profitability, and firm value," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 8(5), pages 487-497, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mercè Sala‐Ríos, 2024. "What are the determinants affecting cooperatives’ profitability? Evidence from Spain," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 95(1), pages 85-111, March.
    2. Erik Syawal Alghifari & Ardi Gunardi & Jaja Suteja & Indah Khoerun Nisa & Zalfa Amarananda, 2022. "Investment Decisions of Energy Sector Companies on the Indonesia Stock Exchange: Theory and Evidence," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 12(6), pages 73-79, November.
    3. Larissa Batrancea, 2021. "Determinants Of Performance During Covid-19 Pandemic: An Empirical Research On Pharmaceutical Companies Listed On The Bucharest Stock Exchange," Management Strategies Journal, Constantin Brancoveanu University, vol. 51(1), pages 136-142.
    4. Imani Mokhtar & Ismah Osman & Fatimah Setapa & Nur Afizah Muhamad Arifin & Roslina Mohamad Shafi & Ruhaini Muda, 2023. "Capital Structure–Firm Performance Nexus: The Moderating Effect of Board Independence," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 15(4), pages 38-47.
    5. Zhefan Piao & Kun Yang & Ning Su & Zihan Zheng, 2024. "Network working capital management, supply chain concentration, and corporate performance of focal companies," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 982-995, September.
    6. Ega Annisa Rizti & Berly Martawardaya, 2022. "Does It Pay to be Good? The Performance of Indonesian Green Companies from 2009–2018," Economics and Finance in Indonesia, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Indonesia, vol. 68, pages 17-36, Juni.
    7. Aakash Jahangir & Amna Shabbir, 2023. "What Determines the Profitability of Business Firms in Pakistan," Business Management and Strategy, Macrothink Institute, vol. 14(2), pages 71-84, December.
    8. Amjad Wajdi Noor Ahmad Kamal & Ameer Irfhan Arshad & Norliza Che-Yahya & Siti Sarah Alyasa-Gan, 2023. "Performance of Shariah vs Non-Shariah Firms: A Study of Manufacturing Sector in Malaysia," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 15(1), pages 149-163.
    9. Hossein Tarighi & Zeynab Nourbakhsh Hosseiny & Maryam Akbari & Elaheh Mohammadhosseini, 2023. "The Moderating Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Relation between Corporate Governance and Firm Performance," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-43, June.
    10. Juan Carlos Chávez & Felipe J. Fonseca & Manuel Gómez-Zaldívar, 2017. "Resoluciones de disputas comerciales y desempeño económico regional en México. (Commercial Disputes Resolution and Regional Economic Performance in Mexico)," Ensayos Revista de Economia, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, Facultad de Economia, vol. 0(1), pages 79-93, May.
    11. Chen, Ray-Bing & Chen, Ying & Härdle, Wolfgang K., 2014. "TVICA—Time varying independent component analysis and its application to financial data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 95-109.
    12. Yan Yu Chen & Chun-Cheih Chao & Fu-Chen Liu & Po-Chen Hsu & Hsueh-Fen Chen & Shih-Chi Peng & Yung-Jen Chuang & Chung-Yu Lan & Wen-Ping Hsieh & David Shan Hill Wong, 2013. "Dynamic Transcript Profiling of Candida albicans Infection in Zebrafish: A Pathogen-Host Interaction Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(9), pages 1-16, September.
    13. Plat, Richard, 2009. "Stochastic portfolio specific mortality and the quantification of mortality basis risk," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 123-132, August.
    14. Kondylis, Athanassios & Whittaker, Joe, 2008. "Spectral preconditioning of Krylov spaces: Combining PLS and PC regression," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(5), pages 2588-2603, January.
    15. Simplice A. Asongu & Nicholas M. Odhiambo, 2019. "Governance, capital flight and industrialisation in Africa," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 8(1), pages 1-22, December.
    16. M. J. Aziakpono & S. Kleimeier & H. Sander, 2012. "Banking market integration in the SADC countries: evidence from interest rate analyses," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(29), pages 3857-3876, October.
    17. Bianca Maria Colosimo & Luca Pagani & Marco Grasso, 2024. "Modeling spatial point processes in video-imaging via Ripley’s K-function: an application to spatter analysis in additive manufacturing," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 429-447, January.
    18. Ouyang, Yaofu & Li, Peng, 2018. "On the nexus of financial development, economic growth, and energy consumption in China: New perspective from a GMM panel VAR approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 238-252.
    19. Fan, Cheng & Sun, Yongjun & Zhao, Yang & Song, Mengjie & Wang, Jiayuan, 2019. "Deep learning-based feature engineering methods for improved building energy prediction," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 35-45.
    20. Ionela Munteanu & Adriana Grigorescu & Elena Condrea & Elena Pelinescu, 2020. "Convergent Insights for Sustainable Development and Ethical Cohesion: An Empirical Study on Corporate Governance in Romanian Public Entities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:8:p:1213-:d:1441808. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.