IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v14y2024i7p974-d1419991.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identification of Fusarium spp. Associated with Chickpea Root Rot in Montana

Author

Listed:
  • Swarnalatha Moparthi

    (Department of Plant Sciences & Plant Pathology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA
    Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA)

  • Oscar Perez-Hernandez

    (School of Agricultural Sciences, Northwest Missouri State University, Maryville, MO 64468, USA)

  • Mary Eileen Burrows

    (Department of Plant Sciences & Plant Pathology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA)

  • Michael J. Bradshaw

    (Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA)

  • Collins Bugingo

    (Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA)

  • Monica Brelsford

    (Department of Plant Sciences & Plant Pathology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA)

  • Kevin McPhee

    (Department of Plant Sciences & Plant Pathology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA)

Abstract

Root rot caused by Fusarium spp. is a significant issue in the chickpea-growing regions of Montana. The specific Fusarium species responsible for the disease and their prevalence remain uncertain. A survey was conducted in 2020 and 2021 to identify Montana’s Fusarium species associated with chickpea. Four hundred and twenty-six Fusarium isolates were recovered from symptomatic chickpea roots across ten counties in the state. Isolates were identified by comparing translation elongation factor 1-α (TEF1-α) sequences in the FUSARIUM-ID database. Among the recovered isolates, Fusarium oxysporum was the most prevalent species (33%), followed by F. acuminatum (21%), F. avenaceum (15%), F. redolens (14%), F. culmorum (6%), F. sporotrichioides (6%), Neocosmospora solani (6%), F. equiseti (2%), F. torulosum (0.9%), F. gamsii (0.8%), F. proliferatum (0.2%), F. pseudograminearum (0.2%), and F. brachygibbosum (0.1%). The aggressiveness of a subset of 51 isolates representing various Fusarium spp. was tested on chickpea cv. ‘CDC Frontier’. A non-parametric variance analysis conducted on disease severity ranks indicated that F. avenaceum isolates were highly aggressive. This study reports for the first time that F. gamsii, F. proliferatum and F. brachygibbosum are causal agents of root rot in chickpea in the United States. This knowledge is invaluable for making informed decisions regarding crop rotation, disease management, and developing resistant chickpea varieties against economically significant Fusarium pathogens.

Suggested Citation

  • Swarnalatha Moparthi & Oscar Perez-Hernandez & Mary Eileen Burrows & Michael J. Bradshaw & Collins Bugingo & Monica Brelsford & Kevin McPhee, 2024. "Identification of Fusarium spp. Associated with Chickpea Root Rot in Montana," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-13, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:7:p:974-:d:1419991
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/7/974/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/7/974/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:7:p:974-:d:1419991. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.