IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v14y2024i7p1084-d1429690.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of Different Farrowing Housing Systems on the Reproductive Performance of Sows and the Losses and Growth of Piglets

Author

Listed:
  • Pavel Nevrkla

    (Department of Animal Breeding, Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, Zemedelska 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Jan Sečkář

    (Department of Animal Breeding, Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, Zemedelska 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Eva Weisbauerová

    (Institute of Animal Science, Prague-Uhrineves, Kostelec nad Orlici, Komenskeho 1239, 517 41 Kostelec Nad Orlici, Czech Republic)

  • Pavel Horký

    (Department of Animal Nutrition and Forage Production, Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, Zemedelska 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Drahomíra Čtvrtlíková Knitlová

    (Department of Animal Breeding, Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, Zemedelska 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Alena Lustyková

    (Institute of Animal Science, Prague-Uhrineves, Kostelec nad Orlici, Komenskeho 1239, 517 41 Kostelec Nad Orlici, Czech Republic)

  • Zdeněk Hadaš

    (Department of Animal Breeding, Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, Zemedelska 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Miroslav Rozkot

    (Institute of Animal Science, Prague-Uhrineves, Kostelec nad Orlici, Komenskeho 1239, 517 41 Kostelec Nad Orlici, Czech Republic)

Abstract

The aim of the experiment was to analyze the reproductive performance of sows and the losses and growth of piglets in three different systems of farrowing houses. A total of 120 sows of the Prestice Black-Pied breed were included in the study with 40 litters evaluated in each of the systems. The housing systems compared were conventional farrowing cages, pens with temporary fixation, and free farrowing pens. The housing system significantly affected the length of pregnancy ( p < 0.05). Its effect was 0.35 days shorter in the sows in the free-farrowing system than in the cage technology and 0.6 days shorter than in the temporary fixation. Housing also influenced the onset of post-weaning oestrus ( p < 0.01), which occurred 0.31 days earlier in the sows in a free-farrowing system and in those in pens with temporary fixation. A significant effect of housing on the overall losses of piglets ( p < 0.05) was also found. The crushing of piglets by sows was also significantly affected by the housing system ( p < 0.05), with the highest incidence found in the free-farrowing system. The effect of the housing system on the individual weaning weight of piglets was also found to be significant ( p < 0.001). The piglets of the sows in the free housing system showed higher growth intensity when compared to piglets in the other housing systems. In conclusion, it can be stated that the lowest losses caused by the crushing of piglets were found in the cage systems. However, the combined system seems to be very perspective in terms of losses of piglets. The free-farrowing system has positive effects on the growth of piglets.

Suggested Citation

  • Pavel Nevrkla & Jan Sečkář & Eva Weisbauerová & Pavel Horký & Drahomíra Čtvrtlíková Knitlová & Alena Lustyková & Zdeněk Hadaš & Miroslav Rozkot, 2024. "The Effect of Different Farrowing Housing Systems on the Reproductive Performance of Sows and the Losses and Growth of Piglets," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-11, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:7:p:1084-:d:1429690
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/7/1084/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/7/1084/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:7:p:1084-:d:1429690. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.