Author
Listed:
- Xinping Li
(College of Agricultural Equipment Engineering, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471000, China)
- Shendi Xu
(College of Agricultural Equipment Engineering, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471000, China)
- Wantong Zhang
(College of Agricultural Equipment Engineering, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471000, China)
- Junyi Wang
(College of Agricultural Equipment Engineering, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471000, China)
- Yanan Li
(College of Agricultural Equipment Engineering, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471000, China)
- Bin Peng
(College of Agricultural Equipment Engineering, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471000, China)
- Ruizhe Sun
(College of Agricultural Equipment Engineering, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471000, China)
Abstract
The threshing rate is one of the important indexes to evaluate the effect of corn threshing. The weighing method is often used to calculate the depuration rate of maize at present. This method is time-consuming and laborious and can only calculate the overall threshing rate but does not give the threshing rate of individual corn ears. Different parameters of corn ears have complex effects on the threshing rate. By analyzing the threshing rate of each corn ear, we can choose the appropriate ear treatment method, optimize the processing equipment and process flow, and improve the threshing performance. This paper presents a method based on machine vision to detect the threshing rate of corn ears. In this method, machine vision was used to measure the parameters of the corncob and the area of the top of residual kernels. The area of the top of all kernels was restored based on the parameters of the corncob. The threshing rate of corn ears was calculated by the ratio of the area of the top of the missing kernel to the area of the top of all kernels after threshing. A bivariate linear regression area model was established to restore the area of the top of all corn kernels based on corncob parameters. The R 2 was more significant than 0.98, and the goodness of fit was good. The machine vision inspection results showed that the maximum relative error of length and midsection radius was 7.46% and 5.55%, and the mean relative error was 2.58% and 2.23%. The maximum relative error of the corn ear threshing rate was 7.08%, and the mean relative error was 2.04%. When the residual kernels were concentrated in the midsection, the inspection result of the corn ear threshing rate was better. The maximum relative error was 3.98%, and the mean relative error was 1.07%. This paper provides a new idea and reference for measuring the threshing rate of corn ears.
Suggested Citation
Xinping Li & Shendi Xu & Wantong Zhang & Junyi Wang & Yanan Li & Bin Peng & Ruizhe Sun, 2024.
"Research on the Detection Method of the Threshing Rate of Corn Ears Based on Machine Vision,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-18, June.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:7:p:1037-:d:1425129
Download full text from publisher
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:7:p:1037-:d:1425129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.