IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v14y2024i6p957-d1417327.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Feeding Systems on Performance, Blood Parameters, Carcass Traits, Meat Quality, and Gene Expressions of Lambs

Author

Listed:
  • Isabela J. dos Santos

    (Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras 37200-000, MG, Brazil
    Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Rio Doce Valley, Governador Valadares 35020-220, MG, Brazil)

  • Paulo C. G. Dias Junior

    (Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras 37200-000, MG, Brazil
    Department of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Americana, Americana 13477-360, SP, Brazil)

  • Tharcilla I. R. C. Alvarenga

    (Armidale Livestock Industries Centre, NSW Department of Primary Industries, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia)

  • Idalmo G. Pereira

    (Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte 31620-295, MG, Brazil)

  • Sarita B. Gallo

    (Department of Nutrition and Animal Production, University of São Paulo, Pirassununga 13635-900, SP, Brazil)

  • Flavio A. P. Alvarenga

    (Armidale Livestock Industries Centre, NSW Department of Primary Industries, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia)

  • Iraides F. Furusho-Garcia

    (Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras 37200-000, MG, Brazil)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of feeding systems on the growth performance of Santa Inês x Dorper lambs, meat quality, fatty acid profile, and gene expression. Thirty lambs at an initial body weight of 22.6 ± 2.59 kg were randomly assigned to one of three feed systems: a grazing system with 1.2% body weight concentrate supplementation (GS); a feedlot system with 28% forage and 72% concentrate (FFC); or feedlot with 85% whole corn grain and 15% pellets (FHG). The lambs were slaughtered after 60 days of experiment. Average daily gain, glucose, and insulin concentration were higher for lambs on FHC than lambs on a GS feeding system. The fatty acid profile in the meat of the lambs fed GS showed a higher proportion of c9t11-C18:2, C20:5, C22:5, and C22:6 compared with FFC and FHC ( p < 0.05). Meat tenderness was lower for lambs under FFC treatment compared with GS and FHG. FHG treatment provides better performance and higher deposition of lipid content in meat compared with GS and FHG. The expression of the genes SCD-1, SREBP1-c, and EVOL6 was greater in lambs undergoing GS and FHC treatments compared with FFC. Results of this research showed a reduced performance of grazing lambs compared with the feedlot system; however, it enhanced the fatty acid profile with increased levels of polyunsaturated acids and reduced n6/n3 ratio.

Suggested Citation

  • Isabela J. dos Santos & Paulo C. G. Dias Junior & Tharcilla I. R. C. Alvarenga & Idalmo G. Pereira & Sarita B. Gallo & Flavio A. P. Alvarenga & Iraides F. Furusho-Garcia, 2024. "Impact of Feeding Systems on Performance, Blood Parameters, Carcass Traits, Meat Quality, and Gene Expressions of Lambs," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:6:p:957-:d:1417327
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/6/957/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/6/957/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Petru Alexandru Vlaicu & Arabela Elena Untea, 2024. "Feeding Strategies and Quality Assessments of Animal-Derived Products," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-5, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:6:p:957-:d:1417327. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.