Author
Listed:
- Khaled Abdeen Mousa Ali
(College of Engineering, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
College of Agricultural Engineering, Al-Azhar University, Cairo 11651, Egypt)
- Sheng Tao Li
(College of Engineering, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China)
- Changyou Li
(College of Engineering, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China)
- Elwan Ali Darwish
(College of Agricultural Engineering, Al-Azhar University, Cairo 11651, Egypt)
- Han Wang
(College of Engineering, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
School of Intelligent Engineering, Shaoguan University, Shaoguan 512099, China)
- Taha Abdelfattah Mohammed Abdelwahab
(College of Agricultural Engineering, Al-Azhar University, Cairo 11651, Egypt)
- Ahmed Elsayed Mahmoud Fodah
(College of Agricultural Engineering, Al-Azhar University, Cairo 11651, Egypt)
- Youssef Fayez Elsaadawi
(College of Agricultural Engineering, Al-Azhar University, Assiut 28784, Egypt)
Abstract
Chickpeas hold significant nutritional and cultural importance, being a rich source of protein, fiber, and essential vitamins and minerals. They are a staple ingredient in various cuisines worldwide. Peeling chickpeas is considered a crucial pre-consumption operation due to the undesirability of peels for some uses. This study aimed to design, test, and evaluate a small chickpea seed peeling machine. The peeling prototype was designed in accordance with the chickpeas’ measured properties; the seeds’ moisture content was determined to be 6.96% (d.b.). The prototype was examined under four different levels of drum revolving speeds (100, 200, 300, and 400 rpm), and three different numbers of brush peeling rows. The prototype was tested with rotors of four, eight, and twelve rows of brushes. The evaluation of the chickpea peeling machine encompassed several parameters, including the machine’s throughput (kg/h), energy consumption (kW), broken seeds percentage (%), unpeeled seeds percentage (%), and peeling efficiency (%). The obtained results revealed that the peeling machine throughput (kg/h) exhibited an upward trend with increases in the rotation speed of the peeling drum. Meanwhile, the throughput decreased as the number of peeling brushes installed on the roller increased. The highest recorded productivity of 71.29 kg/h was achieved under the operational condition of 400 rpm and four peeling brush rows. At the same time, the peeling efficiency increased with the increase in both of peeling drum rotational speed and number of peeling brush rows. The highest peeling efficiency (97.2%) was recorded at the rotational speed of 400 rpm and twelve peeling brush rows. On the other hand, the lowest peeling efficiency (92.85%) was recorded at the lowest drum rotational speed (100 rpm) and number of peeling brush rows (4 rows). In the optimal operational condition, the machines achieved a throughput of 71.29 kg/h, resulting in a peeling cost of 0.001 USD per kilogram. This small-scale chickpea peeling machine is a suitable selection for small and medium producers.
Suggested Citation
Khaled Abdeen Mousa Ali & Sheng Tao Li & Changyou Li & Elwan Ali Darwish & Han Wang & Taha Abdelfattah Mohammed Abdelwahab & Ahmed Elsayed Mahmoud Fodah & Youssef Fayez Elsaadawi, 2024.
"Optimization and Prediction of Operational Parameters for Enhanced Efficiency of a Chickpea Peeling Machine,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-15, May.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:5:p:780-:d:1397414
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:5:p:780-:d:1397414. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.