IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v14y2024i5p719-d1387594.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Analysis of Microbial Communities in the Rhizosphere Soil and Plant Roots of Healthy and Diseased Yuanyang Nanqi ( Panax vietnamensis ) with Root Rot

Author

Listed:
  • Changyuan Chen

    (Faculty of Life Science and Technology, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China
    Yunnan Key Laboratory of Sustainable Utilization of Panax Notoginseng, Kunming 650500, China)

  • Yifan Cheng

    (Faculty of Life Science and Technology, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China
    Yunnan Key Laboratory of Sustainable Utilization of Panax Notoginseng, Kunming 650500, China)

  • Fangli Zhang

    (Faculty of Life Science and Technology, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China
    Yunnan Key Laboratory of Sustainable Utilization of Panax Notoginseng, Kunming 650500, China)

  • Saiying Yu

    (Faculty of Life Science and Technology, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China
    Yunnan Key Laboratory of Sustainable Utilization of Panax Notoginseng, Kunming 650500, China)

  • Xiuming Cui

    (Yunnan Key Laboratory of Sustainable Utilization of Panax Notoginseng, Kunming 650500, China)

  • Yuanshuang Wu

    (Faculty of Life Science and Technology, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China)

Abstract

Microbial communities are not only an important indicator of soil status but also a determinant of plant nutrition and health levels. Loss of microbial community ecosystem control can directly lead to microbial disease occurrence. During the process of Yuanyang Nanqi wild imitation planting, root rot diseases frequently occur, seriously affecting their yield and quality. Via amplicon sequencing, this study mainly compared the microbial community composition between the rhizosphere soil and roots of healthy and diseased Yuanyang Nanqi with root rot. The α-diversity showed that the microbial community diversity and abundance in the roots of diseased Yuanyang Nanqi were much lower than those of those in healthy specimens, while no significant difference was found in the rhizosphere soil. The β-diversity showed that the bacterial community in the Gejiu region and the fungal community in the Honghe region were significantly different from those in other regions. The species relative abundance map showed that there was no obvious difference in microbial community composition between the rhizosphere soil and roots of healthy and diseased Nanqi, but in diseased specimens with root rot, the proportions of Pseudomonas and Fusarium increased. Based on a functional prediction analysis of FUNGuild, the results showed that the Nanqi roots were mainly pathological saprophytic type and that their rhizosphere soil was mainly saprophytic type. The microorganisms in the roots of Yuanyang Nanqi tubers with root rot were also isolated and identified through the use of the culture method. The possible pathogenic strains were tested via anti-inoculation, and Fusarium oxysporum was identified as one of the main pathogenic fungi of Nanqi root rot, which was consistent with the amplicon sequencing results. These results will help us understand the change trend of microbial communities in healthy and diseased plants and analyze the pathogens involved, the pathogenesis, and the beneficial microorganisms, which would provide a theoretical basis for effective biological control.

Suggested Citation

  • Changyuan Chen & Yifan Cheng & Fangli Zhang & Saiying Yu & Xiuming Cui & Yuanshuang Wu, 2024. "A Comparative Analysis of Microbial Communities in the Rhizosphere Soil and Plant Roots of Healthy and Diseased Yuanyang Nanqi ( Panax vietnamensis ) with Root Rot," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-19, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:5:p:719-:d:1387594
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/5/719/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/5/719/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:5:p:719-:d:1387594. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.