Author
Listed:
- Huayu Lu
(College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
Key Laboratory of Farming System, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of China, Beijing 100193, China)
- Ke Ma
(College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
Key Laboratory of Farming System, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of China, Beijing 100193, China)
- Xiangyang Chen
(College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
Key Laboratory of Farming System, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of China, Beijing 100193, China)
- Shiwei Zhou
(College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
Key Laboratory of Farming System, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of China, Beijing 100193, China)
- Yiwei Li
(College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
Key Laboratory of Farming System, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of China, Beijing 100193, China)
- Zecheng Zhang
(College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
Key Laboratory of Farming System, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of China, Beijing 100193, China)
- Chu Wang
(College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
Key Laboratory of Farming System, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of China, Beijing 100193, China)
- Fu Chen
(College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
Key Laboratory of Farming System, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of China, Beijing 100193, China)
- Xinya Wen
(College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
Key Laboratory of Farming System, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of China, Beijing 100193, China)
Abstract
The incorporation of organic fertilizer is an important practice to improve the sustainability and productivity of crop production and decrease environmental pollution from crop-livestock systems in global agriculture. However, establishing an evaluation dataset is still the main challenge for quickly and effectively assessing the effect of management measures on farmland soil health. Hereby, we developed a minimum dataset (MDS) using three methods (network analysis (NA), random forest analysis (RF), and principal component analysis (PCA)). Based on MDS and two scoring functions (nonlinear (NL) and linear scoring curve (L)), the SHI (soil health index framework) was constructed to assess soil health conditions under four fertilization treatments (no fertilization, CK; only chemical fertilizer, NPK; only cow manure, MF; 50% chemical fertilizer + 50% cow manure, NPKM) in the northern ecotone of China. The results showed that the MDS-based on SHIs were positively correlated with each other and SHI-TDS (total dataset), verifying the consistency of soil health assessment models. Higher R 2 was observed in the fitting of SHIs based on NA and TDS, which suggested that nMDS (minimum dataset based on network analysis) could represent most of the information in the TDS. The SHI-NL-nMDS (based on network analysis and nonlinear scoring curve) has the highest ability of sensitivity and accuracy, which indicates that compared with PCA and RF, the SHI based on NA can better embody farmland sol ecosystem functions. In addition, crop yield was significantly positive relative to SHI (soil health index). The incorporation of cow manure and chemical fertilizer improved soil health and increased crop yield. These results indicate that network analysis was a reliable technology for determining the minimum dataset in the evaluation of farmland soil health, and incorporating livestock manure could improve soil health and crop yield in this study area.
Suggested Citation
Huayu Lu & Ke Ma & Xiangyang Chen & Shiwei Zhou & Yiwei Li & Zecheng Zhang & Chu Wang & Fu Chen & Xinya Wen, 2024.
"Multiple Soil Health Assessment Methods for Evaluating Effects of Organic Fertilization in Farmland Soil of Agro-Pastoral Ecotone,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-19, April.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:4:p:572-:d:1369590
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:4:p:572-:d:1369590. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.