Author
Listed:
- Zaibin Wang
(College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Tarim University, Alar 843300, China
Key Laboratory of Modern Agricultural Engineering of Colleges and Universities, Department of Education of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Alar 843300, China
These authors contributed equally to this work)
- Xufeng Wang
(College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Tarim University, Alar 843300, China
Key Laboratory of Modern Agricultural Engineering of Colleges and Universities, Department of Education of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Alar 843300, China
These authors contributed equally to this work)
- Can Hu
(College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Tarim University, Alar 843300, China
Key Laboratory of Modern Agricultural Engineering of Colleges and Universities, Department of Education of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Alar 843300, China)
- Tida Ge
(State Key Laboratory for Managing Biotic and Chemical Threats to the Quality and Safety of Agro-Products, Institute of Plant Virology, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China)
- Long Wang
(College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Tarim University, Alar 843300, China
Key Laboratory of Modern Agricultural Engineering of Colleges and Universities, Department of Education of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Alar 843300, China
College of Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China)
- Jianfei Xing
(College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Tarim University, Alar 843300, China
Key Laboratory of Modern Agricultural Engineering of Colleges and Universities, Department of Education of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Alar 843300, China)
- Xiaowei He
(College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Tarim University, Alar 843300, China
Key Laboratory of Modern Agricultural Engineering of Colleges and Universities, Department of Education of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Alar 843300, China)
- Yachuan Zhao
(College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Tarim University, Alar 843300, China
Key Laboratory of Modern Agricultural Engineering of Colleges and Universities, Department of Education of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Alar 843300, China)
Abstract
The presence of microplastics in soil has become a significant global concern, posing a threat to environmental, agricultural, and human health. However, the use of various detection methods has led to significant discrepancies in the statistics reported for the abundance of soil microplastics across the available literature, resulting in poor comparability across the available literature. Studies have shown that plastic film residue is among the main primary sources of microplastics in farmland soils. Therefore, we manufactured and selected polyethylene microplastics (PE-MPs) from plastic film and combined them with soil samples after density separation treatment, forming a spiked test soil sample, which was subjected to density separation and extraction using a ZnCl 2 solution. The experiment used visual inspection by stereo microscopy, micro-Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, micro-Raman spectrometry, laser direct infrared imaging, and pyrolysis-gas chromatography–mass spectroscopy for the quantitative analysis of spiked soil. This study systematically assessed and compared these five common soil microplastic detection methods. The results revealed different quantitative detection accuracies across various particle size ranges. Micro-Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy showed a broader applicable particle size range (20–5000 μm) and higher detection rate (91%), while the detection range (>50 μm) and rate (70%) of visual inspection through stereo microscopy were lower. For the identification of microplastic morphology, laser direct infrared imaging performed better, whereas micro-Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy had the advantage in determining the types of polymers present over micro-Raman spectrometry. The advantages, disadvantages, and detection rates of the above five detection methods were clarified during the detection process. Considering these findings and similar studies, we suggest three combinations of the evaluated methods to optimize the detection of PE-MPs.
Suggested Citation
Zaibin Wang & Xufeng Wang & Can Hu & Tida Ge & Long Wang & Jianfei Xing & Xiaowei He & Yachuan Zhao, 2024.
"Comparative Evaluation of Analytical Techniques for Quantifying and Characterizing Polyethylene Microplastics in Farmland Soil Samples,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, March.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:4:p:554-:d:1367937
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:4:p:554-:d:1367937. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.